» Articles » PMID: 15580415

Non-pregnant Patients' Preference for Delivery Route

Overview
Date 2004 Dec 8
PMID 15580415
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The objective of the study was to survey non-pregnant women regarding their preference for obstetric delivery route and to assess their awareness of the maternal and fetal risks of obstetric delivery. We wished to determine the percentage of non-pregnant women who would choose elective cesarean section and to correlate demographic factors. We compared women who elected cesarean delivery versus vaginal delivery. All patients presenting for routine gynecologic care were asked to complete an anonymous survey. Demographic variables analyzed were patient age, race, employment, insurance type and household income. Secondary data regarding knowledge of the risks and benefits of cesarean and vaginal delivery were assessed with a Likert Scale. Of patients surveyed, 13.3% preferred cesarean section. The only significant demographic factor was was race, with 21.7% of non-whites and 7.8% of whites choosing cesarean section. Most patients agreed that elective cesarean sections should be performed and reimbursed by insurance. The majority of women answered neutral regarding the maternal and neonatal risks of obstetrical delivery. The unique feature of this observational study is the sole participation of non-pregnant patients. The percentage of women who would elect cesarean section has significant public health implications. The only difference noted between demographic groups is that non-white women had a stronger preference for cesarean. Without counseling, most women are unsure of the risks of delivery route on maternal and neonatal health.

Citing Articles

Is it the decision of women to choose a cesarean section as the mode of birth? A review of literature on the views of stakeholders.

Yuen Loke A, Davies L, Mak Y BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019; 19(1):286.

PMID: 31399072 PMC: 6688235. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-019-2440-2.


U.S. Nulliparas' Reasons for Expected Provider Type and Childbirth Setting.

Arcia A J Perinat Educ. 2016; 24(1):61-72.

PMID: 26937162 PMC: 4720858. DOI: 10.1891/1058-1243.24.1.61.


Women's preference for caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Mazzoni A, Althabe F, Liu N, Bonotti A, Gibbons L, Sanchez A BJOG. 2010; 118(4):391-9.

PMID: 21134103 PMC: 3312015. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02793.x.


Preferences and concerns for delivery: an antepartum survey.

Bracken J, Dryfhout V, Goldenhar L, Pauls R Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008; 19(11):1527-31.

PMID: 18633559 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-008-0680-1.


Prevalence and correlates of stress urinary incontinence during pregnancy: a survey at UNICAMP Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.

Scarpa K, Herrmann V, Palma P, Riccetto C, Morais S Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005; 17(3):219-23.

PMID: 16021326 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-005-1361-y.

References
1.
Jackson N, Irvine L . The influence of maternal request on the elective caesarean section rate. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004; 18(2):115-9. DOI: 10.1080/01443619867812. View

2.
Gamble J, Creedy D . Women's request for a cesarean section: a critique of the literature. Birth. 2001; 27(4):256-63. DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2000.00256.x. View

3.
Arya L, Jackson N, Myers D, Verma A . Risk of new-onset urinary incontinence after forceps and vacuum delivery in primiparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 185(6):1318-23; discussion 1323-4. DOI: 10.1067/mob.2001.120365. View

4.
Paterson-Brown S . Should doctors perform an elective caesarean section on request? Yes, as long as the woman is fully informed. BMJ. 1998; 317(7156):462-3. PMC: 1113715. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.317.7156.462. View

5.
Sachs B, McCarthy B, Rubin G, Burton A, Terry J, Tyler Jr C . Cesarean section. Risk and benefits for mother and fetus. JAMA. 1983; 250(16):2157-9. DOI: 10.1001/jama.250.16.2157. View