The Gap Between Guidelines, Practice, and Knowledge in Interpreting Services for Deaf Students
Overview
Otorhinolaryngology
Affiliations
In this article, we examine the literature on educational interpreting for information related to optimal interpreting in school settings. this literature review is coupled with an examination of 15 guidelines for educational interpreters in school districts and programs for the deaf and hard of hearing across the United States. With this information, we then explore discrepancies between what guidelines recommend, what actually occurs in classrooms, and what research on the process of interpreting has found on the basis of three major areas of concern: the production of the message by the interpreter, the reception of the message by the student, and additional responsibilities required of interpreters working in school programs.
Clark K, Sheikh A, Swartzenberg J, Gleason A, Cummings C, Dominguez J J Chem Educ. 2024; 99(1):122-128.
PMID: 38605936 PMC: 11006234. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c01368.
Berge S, Thomassen G J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2015; 21(2):187-99.
PMID: 26681267 PMC: 4886316. DOI: 10.1093/deafed/env057.
Benefits of sign language interpreting and text alternatives for deaf students' classroom learning.
Marschark M, Leigh G, Sapere P, Burnham D, Convertino C, Stinson M J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2006; 11(4):421-37.
PMID: 16928778 PMC: 1686598. DOI: 10.1093/deafed/enl013.
Marschark M, Pelz J, Convertino C, Sapere P, Arndt M, Seewagen R Am Educ Res J. 2006; 42(4):727-761.
PMID: 16628250 PMC: 1440927. DOI: 10.3102/00028312042004727.