Genome Scanning for Interspecific Differentiation Between Two Closely Related Oak Species [Quercus Robur L. and Q. Petraea (Matt.) Liebl.]

Overview

Journal Genetics

Publisher Oxford University Press

Specialty Genetics

Date 2004 Dec 8

PMID 15579711

Citations 53

Authors

Caroline Scotti-Saintagne

Stephanie Mariette

Ilga Porth

Pablo G Goicoechea

Teresa Barreneche

Catherine Bodenes

Kornel Burg

Antoine Kremer

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Interspecific differentiation values (G(ST)) between two closely related oak species (Quercus petraea and Q. robur) were compiled across different studies with the aim to explore the distribution of differentiation at the genome level. The study was based on a total set of 389 markers (isozymes, AFLPs, SCARs, microsatellites, and SNPs) for which allelic frequencies were estimated in pairs of populations sampled throughout the sympatric distribution of the two species. The overall distribution of G(ST) values followed an L-shaped curve with most markers exhibiting low species differentiation (G(ST) < 0.01) and only a few loci reaching >10% levels. Twelve percent of the loci exhibited significant G(ST) deviations to neutral expectations, suggesting that selection contributed to species divergence. Coding regions expressed higher differentiation than noncoding regions. Among the 389 markers, 158 could be mapped on the 12 linkage groups of the existing Q. robur genetic map. Outlier loci with large G(ST) values were distributed over 9 linkage groups. One cluster of three outlier loci was found within 0.51 cM; but significant autocorrelation of G(ST) was observed at distances <2 cM. The size and distribution of genomic regions involved in species divergence are discussed in reference to hitchhiking effects and disruptive selection.

Citing Articles

A haplotype-resolved chromosome-scale genome for Quercus rubra L. provides insights into the genetics of adaptive traits for red oak species.

Kapoor B, Jenkins J, Schmutz J, Zhebentyayeva T, Kuelheim C, Coggeshall M G3 (Bethesda). 2023; 13(11).

PMID: 37708394 PMC: 10627279. DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkad209.

A Small Set of Nuclear Markers for Reliable Differentiation of the Two Closely Related Oak Species and .

Schroeder H, Kersten B Plants (Basel). 2023; 12(3).

PMID: 36771649 PMC: 9919172. DOI: 10.3390/plants12030566.

Tracking population structure and phenology through time using ancient genomes from waterlogged white oak wood.

Wagner S, Seguin-Orlando A, Leple J, Leroy T, Lalanne C, Labadie K Mol Ecol. 2023; 33(3):e16859.

PMID: 36748324 PMC: 7615563. DOI: 10.1111/mec.16859.

Genetic Variability and Admixture Zones in the Italian Populations of Turkey Oak ( L.).

Bertolasi B, Zago L, Gui L, Cossu P, Vanetti I, Rizzi S Life (Basel). 2023; 13(1).

PMID: 36675965 PMC: 9863001. DOI: 10.3390/life13010018.

Multiomics Molecular Research into the Recalcitrant and Orphan Tree Species: Why, What for, and How.

Maldonado-Alconada A, Castillejo M, Rey M, Labella-Ortega M, Tienda-Parrilla M, Hernandez-Lao T Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(17).

PMID: 36077370 PMC: 9456323. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23179980.

References

Kondrashov A, Kondrashov F . Interactions among quantitative traits in the course of sympatric speciation. Nature. 1999; 400(6742):351-4. DOI: 10.1038/22514. View

Dieckmann U, Doebeli M . On the origin of species by sympatric speciation. Nature. 1999; 400(6742):354-7. DOI: 10.1038/22521. View

Hamblin M, Aquadro C . DNA sequence variation and the recombinational landscape in Drosophila pseudoobscura: a study of the second chromosome. Genetics. 1999; 153(2):859-69. PMC: 1460763. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/153.2.859. View

Rieseberg L, Baird S, Gardner K . Hybridization, introgression, and linkage evolution. Plant Mol Biol. 2000; 42(1):205-24. View

Muir G, Fleming C, Schlotterer C . Species status of hybridizing oaks. Nature. 2000; 405(6790):1016. DOI: 10.1038/35016640. View

Gerber S, Mariette S, Streiff R, Bodenes C, Kremer A . Comparison of microsatellites and amplified fragment length polymorphism markers for parentage analysis. Mol Ecol. 2000; 9(8):1037-48. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.00961.x. View

Draye X, Lin Y, Qian X, Bowers J, Burow G, Morrell P . Toward integration of comparative genetic, physical, diversity, and cytomolecular maps for grasses and grains, using the sorghum genome as a foundation. Plant Physiol. 2001; 125(3):1325-41. PMC: 65612. DOI: 10.1104/pp.125.3.1325. View

Orr H . The genetics of species differences. Trends Ecol Evol. 2001; 16(7):343-350. DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02167-x. View

Schliewen U, Rassmann K, Markmann M, Markert J, Kocher T, Tautz D . Genetic and ecological divergence of a monophyletic cichlid species pair under fully sympatric conditions in Lake Ejagham, Cameroon. Mol Ecol. 2001; 10(6):1471-88. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2001.01276.x. View

10.

Tenaillon M, Sawkins M, Long A, Gaut R, Doebley J, Gaut B . Patterns of DNA sequence polymorphism along chromosome 1 of maize (Zea mays ssp. mays L.). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98(16):9161-6. PMC: 55390. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.151244298. View

11.

Mariette S, Chagne D, Lezier C, Pastuszka P, Raffin A, Plomion C . Genetic diversity within and among Pinus pinaster populations: comparison between AFLP and microsatellite markers. Heredity (Edinb). 2001; 86(Pt 4):469-79. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00852.x. View

12.

Gomory D, Yakovlev I, Zhelev P, Jedinakova J, Paule L . Genetic differentiation of oak populations within the Quercus robur/Quercus petraea complex in Central and Eastern Europe. Heredity (Edinb). 2001; 86(Pt 5):557-63. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00874.x. View

13.

Andolfatto P . Adaptive hitchhiking effects on genome variability. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2001; 11(6):635-41. DOI: 10.1016/s0959-437x(00)00246-x. View

14.

Rundle H . A test of ecologically dependent postmating isolation between sympatric sticklebacks. Evolution. 2002; 56(2):322-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01342.x. View

15.

Ardlie K, Kruglyak L, Seielstad M . Patterns of linkage disequilibrium in the human genome. Nat Rev Genet. 2002; 3(4):299-309. DOI: 10.1038/nrg777. View

16.

Robertson A . Gene frequency distributions as a test of selective neutrality. Genetics. 1975; 81(4):775-85. PMC: 1213434. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/81.4.775. View

17.

Akey J, Zhang G, Zhang K, Jin L, Shriver M . Interrogating a high-density SNP map for signatures of natural selection. Genome Res. 2002; 12(12):1805-14. PMC: 187574. DOI: 10.1101/gr.631202. View

18.

Schlotterer C . Hitchhiking mapping--functional genomics from the population genetics perspective. Trends Genet. 2002; 19(1):32-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9525(02)00012-4. View

19.

Coart E, Lamote V, DE Loose M, Van Bockstaele E, Lootens P, Roldan-Ruiz I . AFLP markers demonstrate local genetic differentiation between two indigenous oak species [ Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.] in Flemish populations. Theor Appl Genet. 2003; 105(2-3):431-439. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-002-0920-6. View

20.

Le Corre V, Kremer A . Genetic variability at neutral markers, quantitative trait land trait in a subdivided population under selection. Genetics. 2003; 164(3):1205-19. PMC: 1462636. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/164.3.1205. View