» Articles » PMID: 15576545

Lay Understanding of Familial Risk of Common Chronic Diseases: a Systematic Review and Synthesis of Qualitative Research

Overview
Journal Ann Fam Med
Specialty Public Health
Date 2004 Dec 4
PMID 15576545
Citations 100
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Although the family history is increasingly used for genetic risk assessment of common chronic diseases in primary care, evidence suggests that lay understanding about inheritance may conflict with medical models. This study systematically reviewed and synthesized the qualitative literature exploring understanding about familial risk held by persons with a family history of cancer, coronary artery disease, and diabetes mellitus.

Methods: Twenty-two qualitative articles were found after a comprehensive literature search and were critically appraised; 11 were included. A meta-ethnographic approach was used to translate the studies across each other, synthesize the translation, and express the synthesis.

Results: A dynamic process emerged by which a personal sense of vulnerability included some features that mirror the medical factors used to assess risk, such as the number of affected relatives. Other features are more personal, such as experience of a relative's disease, sudden or premature death, perceived patterns of illness relating to gender or age at death, and comparisons between a person and an affected relative. The developing vulnerability is interpreted using personal mental models, including models of disease causation, inheritance, and fatalism. A person's sense of vulnerability affects how that person copes with, and attempts to control, any perceived familial risk.

Conclusions: Persons with a family history of a common chronic disease develop a personal sense of vulnerability that is informed by the salience of their family history and interpreted within their personal models of disease causation and inheritance. Features that give meaning to familial risk may be perceived differently by patients and professionals. This review identifies key areas for health professionals to explore with patients that may improve the effectiveness of communication about disease risk and management.

Citing Articles

Knowledge, attitudes and demand toward cardiovascular polygenic risk testing in clinical practice: cross-sectional survey of patients.

Brar S, Townsend J, Phulka J, Halperin L, Liew J, Parker J Eur J Hum Genet. 2024; .

PMID: 39645542 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-024-01762-0.


Factors associated with diabetes knowledge, attitudes and practices among people aged 18 and over in the commune of Niakhene in Senegal.

Diallo A, Dieng C, Tine J, Bassoum O, Diongue F, Ba M PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024; 4(3):e0002265.

PMID: 38451973 PMC: 10919690. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002265.


Perception of inherited risk in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.

Airikkala E, Laaksonen M, Halkoaho A, Kaunonen M Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1293874.

PMID: 38155883 PMC: 10752975. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1293874.


Advancing the communication of genetic risk for cardiometabolic diseases: a critical interpretive synthesis.

Law J, Sultan N, Finer S, Fudge N BMC Med. 2023; 21(1):432.

PMID: 37953248 PMC: 10641935. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-023-03150-9.


Personalized prediction for multiple chronic diseases by developing the multi-task Cox learning model.

Zhang S, Yang F, Wang L, Si S, Zhang J, Xue F PLoS Comput Biol. 2023; 19(9):e1011396.

PMID: 37733837 PMC: 10569718. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011396.


References
1.
Fry A, Campbell H, Gudmunsdottir H, Rush R, Porteous M, Gorman D . GPs' views on their role in cancer genetics services and current practice. Fam Pract. 1999; 16(5):468-74. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/16.5.468. View

2.
Britten N, Campbell R, Pope C, Donovan J, Morgan M, Pill R . Using meta ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: a worked example. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002; 7(4):209-15. DOI: 10.1258/135581902320432732. View

3.
Kumar S, Gantley M . Tensions between policy makers and general practitioners in implementing new genetics: grounded theory interview study. BMJ. 1999; 319(7222):1410-3. PMC: 28287. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.319.7222.1410. View

4.
Montgomery A, Fahey T, Peters T, MacIntosh C, Sharp D . Evaluation of computer based clinical decision support system and risk chart for management of hypertension in primary care: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2000; 320(7236):686-90. PMC: 27312. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.320.7236.686. View

5.
Emery J, Rose P . Expanding the role of the family history in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2000; 49(441):260-1. PMC: 1313388. View