» Articles » PMID: 15562927

Utilization of Low-profile Intra-aortic Balloon Catheters Inserted by the Sheathless Technique in Acute Cardiac Patients: Clinical Efficacy with a Very Low Complication Rate

Overview
Journal Clin Cardiol
Date 2004 Nov 26
PMID 15562927
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unlabelled: Initial intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) catheters were of large caliber and their utilization resulted in a high incidence of complications, including limb ischemia, bleeding and thrombosis, peripheral neurologic sequelae, and infection. Despite eventual decrease in the size of IABP catheters, the complication rate has remained high.

Hypothesis: The study was undertaken to determine whether use of recently available low-profile IABP catheters would result in a lower incidence of vascular and bleeding complications.

Methods: We prospectively evaluated the incidence of complications when consecutively using the low-profile (8F) IABP catheter inserted mostly sheathlessly in 161 acute cardiac patients between January 1, 2000 and April, 2003.

Results: Complications encountered included mild transient limb ischemia in two patients (1.2%), minor bleeding episodes in four patients (2.4%), one major puncture site bleeding (0.6%), and a pseudoaneurysm treated percutaneously in two patients (1.2%). Two patients (1.2%) suffered limb ischemia due to embolization or local thrombosis requiring vascular intervention. These complications were milder and their incidence remarkably lower than those reported previously when IABP catheters larger than 8F were used.

Conclusion: Utilization of low-profile IABP 8F catheters in a sheathless technique entails an exceedingly low complication rate despite an acute presentation, intense anticoagulant and antiaggregant therapy, frequent comorbidity, advanced age, severe coronary disease, and reduced cardiac function in a large proportion of treated patients.

Citing Articles

Contemporary outcomes of cardiac surgery patients supported by the intra-aortic balloon pump.

Lorusso R, Heuts S, Jiritano F, Scrofani R, Antona C, Dato G Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022; 35(1).

PMID: 35381083 PMC: 9252119. DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivac091.


The science of safety: complications associated with the use of mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock and best practices to maximize safety.

Kapur N, Whitehead E, Thayer K, Pahuja M F1000Res. 2020; 9.

PMID: 32765837 PMC: 7391013. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.25518.1.


Vascular complications following intra-aortic balloon pump implantation: an updated review.

de Jong M, Lorusso R, Al Awami F, Matteuci F, Parise O, Lozekoot P Perfusion. 2017; 33(2):96-104.

PMID: 28816093 PMC: 5844455. DOI: 10.1177/0267659117727825.


Use of Intra-aortic- Balloon Pump Counterpulsation in Patients with Symptomatic Vasospasm Following Subarachnoid Hemorrhage and Neurogenic Stress Cardiomyopathy.

Al-Mufti F, Morris N, Lahiri S, Roth W, Witsch J, Machado I J Vasc Interv Neurol. 2016; 9(1):28-34.

PMID: 27403221 PMC: 4925763.


Intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation in the setting of subarachnoid hemorrhage, cerebral vasospasm, and neurogenic stress cardiomyopathy. Case report and review of the literature.

Lazaridis C, Pradilla G, Nyquist P, Tamargo R Neurocrit Care. 2010; 13(1):101-8.

PMID: 20383610 DOI: 10.1007/s12028-010-9358-x.

References
1.
Arafa O, Pedersen T, Svennevig J, Fosse E, Geiran O . Vascular complications of the intraaortic balloon pump in patients undergoing open heart operations: 15-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999; 67(3):645-51. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(98)01272-7. View

2.
Kumbasar S, Semiz E, Sancaktar O, Yalcinkaya S, Deger N . Mechanical complications of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation. Int J Cardiol. 1999; 70(1):69-73. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-5273(99)00057-1. View

3.
Cohen M, Dawson M, Kopistansky C, McBride R . Sex and other predictors of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation-related complications: prospective study of 1119 consecutive patients. Am Heart J. 2000; 139(2 Pt 1):282-7. DOI: 10.1067/mhj.2000.101489. View

4.
Ferguson 3rd J, Cohen M, Freedman Jr R, Stone G, Miller M, Joseph D . The current practice of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation: results from the Benchmark Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 38(5):1456-62. DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01553-4. View

5.
Meharwal Z, Trehan N . Vascular complications of intra-aortic balloon insertion in patients undergoing coronary reavscularization: analysis of 911 cases. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002; 21(4):741-7. DOI: 10.1016/s1010-7940(02)00034-9. View