» Articles » PMID: 15554279

Lifting of the Colon for Laparoscopic-assisted Colectomy for Colon and Rectal Cancer

Overview
Journal JSLS
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2004 Nov 24
PMID 15554279
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Objectives: Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for colon and rectal cancer causes less surgical trauma than does open colectomy. However, current methods are more costly and require highly skilled staff. In addition, the technique for lymphadenectomy has yet to be standardized. We developed a technique that uses a nylon suture to elevate the colon. This method reduces costs without compromising the completeness of the resection.

Methods: Three trocars are introduced and a 1-0 nylon suture is passed into the abdominal cavity and through the mesocolon. The colon is retracted anteriorly and is fixed by this suture to the abdominal wall. The main mesenteric vessels are under tension, and lymph node dissection is performed easily. This method requires only 2 surgeons, an operator, and a scopist, because the colon is fixed to the abdominal wall. In addition, the working space is more stable because the colon is fixed to the abdominal wall. The procedure is relatively independent of the skill of the first assistant.

Results: From April 2000 to August 2002, this method was performed in 52 patients. The mean number of dissected lymph nodes was 16.9+/-9.0 (range, 6 to 41). Nine patients had lymph node metastases (17.3%). One patient developed hepatic recurrence; all patients are alive. No complication occurred that was related to lifting the colon.

Conclusions: Using a suture to lift the colon is a useful method for performing laparoscopic-assisted colectomy with lymphadenectomy. This method reduces the number of surgical staff and the expense of the procedure.

Citing Articles

Single-incision laparoscopic versus traditional multiport laparoscopic colorectal surgery--a cumulative meta-analysis and systematic review.

Lv C, Wu S, Wu Y, Shi J, Su Y, Fan Y Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013; 28(5):611-21.

PMID: 23386215 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-013-1653-5.


Single-incision laparoscopic surgery using colon-lifting technique for colorectal cancer: a matched case-control comparison with standard multiport laparoscopic surgery in terms of short-term results and access instrument cost.

Fujii S, Watanabe K, Ota M, Watanabe J, Ichikawa Y, Yamagishi S Surg Endosc. 2011; 26(5):1403-11.

PMID: 22101420 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-2047-9.


Ultrasonically activated scalpel versus monopolar electrocautery shovel in laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Zhou B, Song W, Yan Q, Cai J, Wang F, Liu J World J Gastroenterol. 2008; 14(25):4065-9.

PMID: 18609692 PMC: 2725347. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.14.4065.

References
1.
Franklin M, Kazantsev G, Abrego D, Balli J, Glass J . Laparoscopic surgery for stage III colon cancer: long-term follow-up. Surg Endosc. 2000; 14(7):612-6. DOI: 10.1007/s004640000169. View

2.
Bouvet M, Mansfield P, Skibber J, Curley S, Ellis L, Giacco G . Clinical, pathologic, and economic parameters of laparoscopic colon resection for cancer. Am J Surg. 1999; 176(6):554-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00261-x. View

3.
Champault G, Barrat C, Raselli R, Elizalde A, Catheline J . Laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal carcinoma: a prospective clinical trial involving 157 cases with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2002; 12(2):88-95. DOI: 10.1097/00129689-200204000-00003. View

4.
Lezoche E, Feliciotti F, Paganini A, Guerrieri M, De Sanctis A, Minervini S . Laparoscopic vs open hemicolectomy for colon cancer. Surg Endosc. 2002; 16(4):596-602. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-001-9053-2. View

5.
Senagore A, Duepree H, Delaney C, Dissanaike S, Brady K, Fazio V . Cost structure of laparoscopic and open sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: similarities and differences. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002; 45(4):485-90. DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-6225-x. View