» Articles » PMID: 15520691

Incremental Versus Maximum Bite Advancement During Twin-block Therapy: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2004 Nov 3
PMID 15520691
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of incremental and maximum bite advancement during treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion with the Twin-block appliance in the permanent dentition. It was performed at 3 district general hospitals in the United Kingdom with 4 operators. Two hundred three patients, 10-14 years old, were randomized. Control patients had the initial bite taken edge-to-edge for appliance construction with a standard Twin-block. Experimental patients had 2 mm initial bite advancement and subsequent 2 mm advancements at 6 weekly intervals with a Twin-block appliance incorporating advancement screws. Data were collected at the start and the finish of Twin-block treatment. The use of incremental advancement of the Twin-block did not confer any advantages in terms of process and outcome of the treatment. However, patient compliance was influenced by operator and patient age. The duration of treatment was influenced by operator and initial overjet. Incremental bite advancement produced no advantages over maximum advancement.

Citing Articles

Comparison between twin block appliance and mandibular advancement on clear aligners in the improvement of airway dimension: incremental versus maximum bite advancement.

Cretella Lombardo E, Lugli L, Cozza P, Lione R, Loberto S, Pavoni C Front Oral Health. 2024; 5:1463416.

PMID: 39291132 PMC: 11405374. DOI: 10.3389/froh.2024.1463416.


Effects of twin-block appliance on upper airway parameters in OSA children with class II malocclusion and mandibular retrognathia: a CBCT study.

Zreaqat M, Hassan R, Samsudin A, Alforaidi S Eur J Pediatr. 2023; 182(12):5501-5510.

PMID: 37777602 DOI: 10.1007/s00431-023-05226-3.


Skeletal and Dental Effects of Twin-Block Appliances in Patients Treated With or Without Expansion.

Buyukcavus M, Kale B Turk J Orthod. 2022; 34(3):155-162.

PMID: 35110185 PMC: 8939253. DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2021.20103.


Stepwise versus single-step mandibular advancement with functional appliance in treating class II patients : A meta-analysis.

Chen Z, Chen Q, Fan X, Li Y, Mo S J Orofac Orthop. 2020; 81(5):311-327.

PMID: 32415333 DOI: 10.1007/s00056-020-00229-3.


Frankel 2 appliance versus the Modified Twin Block appliance for Phase 1 treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion in children and adolescents: .

Campbell C, Millett D, Kelly N, Cooke M, Cronin M Angle Orthod. 2019; 90(2):202-208.

PMID: 31613144 PMC: 8051232. DOI: 10.2319/042419-290.1.