» Articles » PMID: 15517141

[PET/CT in Lymphoma Patients]

Overview
Journal Radiologe
Specialty Radiology
Date 2004 Nov 2
PMID 15517141
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: First results of PET/CT in Hodgkin's disease (HD) and aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) are reported.

Patients And Methods: From March 2001 to August 2004 822 PET/CT were performed at our clinic in lymphoma patients for primary staging, restaging after therapy, and diagnosis of recurrence. For coregistration non contrast-enhanced low-dose CT were used.

Results: Due to the exact anatomic localization of (18)F-FDG accumulating lesions equivocal or false positive PET findings are avoided. In comparison to contrast enhanced CT, PET/CT has a higher sensitivity and specificity in patients with HD and aggressive NHL. Integration of PET/CT in treatment planning of radiation therapy optimizes the field volume.

Conclusion: Even in the initial phase of clinical evaluation, PET/CT has proven useful in staging and restaging of lymphoma. The exact anatomic localization of the PET findings is essential for a precise report, for treatment planning of radiation therapy, and for planning surgical biopsy.

Citing Articles

Malaria masquerading as relapse of Hodgkin's lymphoma on contrast enhanced (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography: A diagnostic dilemma.

Jeph S, Thakur K, Shamim S, Aggarwal A Indian J Nucl Med. 2014; 29(2):102-4.

PMID: 24761064 PMC: 3996762. DOI: 10.4103/0972-3919.130299.


Value of PET/CT versus PET and CT performed as separate investigations in patients with Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Fougere C, Hundt W, Brockel N, Pfluger T, Haug A, Scher B Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006; 33(12):1417-25.

PMID: 16858568 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-006-0171-x.


Is PET/CT necessary in paediatric oncology? Against.

Hahn K, Pfluger T Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006; 33(8):966-8.

PMID: 16838141 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-006-0115-5.

References
1.
Schaefer N, Hany T, Taverna C, Seifert B, Stumpe K, von Schulthess G . Non-Hodgkin lymphoma and Hodgkin disease: coregistered FDG PET and CT at staging and restaging--do we need contrast-enhanced CT?. Radiology. 2004; 232(3):823-9. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2323030985. View

2.
Bangerter M, Kotzerke J, Griesshammer M, Elsner K, Reske S, Bergmann L . Positron emission tomography with 18-fluorodeoxyglucose in the staging and follow-up of lymphoma in the chest. Acta Oncol. 1999; 38(6):799-804. DOI: 10.1080/028418699432969. View

3.
Cook G, Fogelman I, Maisey M . Normal physiological and benign pathological variants of 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron-emission tomography scanning: potential for error in interpretation. Semin Nucl Med. 1996; 26(4):308-14. DOI: 10.1016/s0001-2998(96)80006-7. View

4.
Hany T, Gharehpapagh E, Kamel E, Buck A, Himms-Hagen J, von Schulthess G . Brown adipose tissue: a factor to consider in symmetrical tracer uptake in the neck and upper chest region. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002; 29(10):1393-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-002-0902-6. View

5.
Dizendorf E, Baumert B, von Schulthess G, Lutolf U, Steinert H . Impact of whole-body 18F-FDG PET on staging and managing patients for radiation therapy. J Nucl Med. 2003; 44(1):24-9. View