» Articles » PMID: 15510185

Penile Measurements in Normal Adult Jordanians and in Patients with Erectile Dysfunction

Overview
Journal Int J Impot Res
Date 2004 Oct 29
PMID 15510185
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this work was to determine penile size in adult normal (group one, 271) and impotent (group two, 109) Jordanian patients. Heights of the patients, the flaccid and fully stretched penile lengths were measured in centimeters in both groups. Midshaft circumference in the flaccid state was recorded in group one. Penile length in the fully erect penis was measured in group two. In group one mean midshaft circumference was 8.98+/-1.4, mean flaccid length was mean 9.3+/-1.9, and mean stretched length was 13.5+/-2.3. In group two, mean flaccid length was 7.7+/-1.3, and mean stretched length was 11.6+/-1.4. The mean of fully erect penile length after trimex injection was 11.8+/-1.5. In group 1 there was no correlation between height and flaccid length or stretched length, but there was a significant correlation between height and midpoint circumference, flaccid and stretched lengths, and between stretched lengths and midpoint circumference. In group 2 there was no correlation between height and flaccid, stretched, or fully erect lengths. On the other hand, there was a significant correlation between the flaccid, stretched and fully erect lengths. Comparing group 1 and group 2, the patients in group 1 were slightly older than in group 2 (P=0.035), but there was no significant difference in their height. However, there was a significant difference regarding the mean flaccid length 9.3 vs 7.7 (P=0.001), and the mean stretched length 13.5 vs 11.6 (P=0.000). We divided both groups into those who are less than 40 y of age, and over 40 y old. There was no statistical difference in the stretched and flaccid lengths between the younger and older individuals in each group. However, when we compared the stretched and flaccid lengths in those of less than 40 y old in group 1 and 2, a significant difference was noticed. Similarly, a significant difference in the stretched and flaccid lengths in those patients over 40 y of age was also present.

Citing Articles

Advancing Precision in Penile Length Measurement: Evidence-based Synthesis of Stretched Penile Length INdicator Technique (SPLINT).

Goel P, Choudhury P, Saroya K, Jain V, Dhua A, Yadav D J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2024; 29(5):492-504.

PMID: 39479430 PMC: 11521232. DOI: 10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_11_24.


Dynamic compliance penis enlargement patch.

Zheng R, Zhong W, Chai M, Shi X Bioact Mater. 2024; 42:194-206.

PMID: 39285912 PMC: 11403245. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.08.039.


Multidisciplinary approach and management of patients who seek medical advice for penile size concerns: a narrative review.

Schifano N, Cakir O, Castiglione F, Montorsi F, Garaffa G Int J Impot Res. 2021; 34(5):434-451.

PMID: 34045688 DOI: 10.1038/s41443-021-00444-5.


Cosmetic penile enhancement surgery: a 3-year single-centre retrospective clinical evaluation of 355 cases.

Littara A, Melone R, Morales-Medina J, Iannitti T, Palmieri B Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):6323.

PMID: 31004096 PMC: 6474863. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-41652-w.


Outcomes of variation in technique and variation in accuracy of measurement in penile length measurement.

Habous M, Muir G, Soliman T, Farag M, Williamson B, Binsaleh S Int J Impot Res. 2017; 30(1):21-26.

PMID: 29180797 PMC: 8519169. DOI: 10.1038/s41443-017-0013-3.