» Articles » PMID: 15484341

Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection for Outlet Obstruction: a Prospective, Multicenter Trial

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2004 Oct 16
PMID 15484341
Citations 72
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: This prospective, multicenter trial was designed to assess the safety and effectiveness of a novel technique in the treatment of outlet obstruction caused by the combination of intussusception and rectocele by using a double-transanal, 33-mm circular stapler.

Methods: From January to October 2001, 90 patients with outlet obstruction were operated on and followed (mean, 16.3 +/- 2.9 months) by the validated Constipation Scoring and Continence Grading Systems, clinical examination, defecography, and anorectal manometry. Anal ultrasound also was performed in 58 multiparous patients.

Results: Operative time and hospital stay were short (mean, 43.3 +/- 8.7 minutes and 2.1 +/- 0.8 days, respectively), and postoperative pain was minimal. The mean time to resume normal activity was 10.2 +/- 4.5 days. Complications were 17.8 percent fecal urgency, 8.9 percent incontinence to flatus, 5.5 percent urinary retention, 4.4 percent bleeding, 3.3 percent anastomotic stenosis, and 1.1 percent pneumonia. All constipation symptoms significantly improved (P < 0.001) without worsening of anal continence. No patient complained of dyspareunia. At postoperative defecography, all patients had a double incisure of the lower rectal outline in the site of anastomosis, with the disappearance of both intussusception and rectocele. Anal pressure was not significantly modified, whereas rectal compliance was restored (P < 0.05). No lesions of anal sphincters caused by the operation were found in multiparous patients. The outcome at one year was excellent in 48 of 90 patients, good in 33, fairly good in 5, and poor in 4.

Conclusions: This novel technique seems to be safe and effective in the treatment of outlet obstruction caused by the combination of intussusception and rectocele. Randomized trials are required to confirm these findings.

Citing Articles

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of different surgical procedures for patients with hemorrhoids: a network meta-analysis.

Yuan X, Wu J, Yin H, Ma C, Cheng S Tech Coloproctol. 2023; 27(10):799-811.

PMID: 37634164 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-023-02855-6.


Perirectal hematoma after stapled surgery for hemorrhoidal prolapse and obstructed defecation syndrome: case series management to avoid panic-guided treatment.

Mascagni D, Eberspacher C, Naldini G, Arcieri F, Mascagni P, Cirocchi R Updates Surg. 2023; 75(3):627-634.

PMID: 36899291 PMC: 10042767. DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01490-y.


Time trend in the surgical management of obstructed defecation syndrome: a multicenter experience on behalf of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR).

Picciariello A, Rinaldi M, Grossi U, Trompetto M, Graziano G, Altomare D Tech Coloproctol. 2022; 26(12):963-971.

PMID: 36104607 PMC: 9637616. DOI: 10.1007/s10151-022-02705-x.


Ventral Prosthesis Rectopexy for obstructed defaecation syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Manatakis D, Gouvas N, Pechlivanides G, Xynos E Updates Surg. 2021; 74(1):11-21.

PMID: 34665411 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01177-2.


Impact of TRREMS on symptoms of obstructed defecation due to rectocele: predictive factors and outcomes.

Regadas F, Murad-Regadas S, Rodrigues L, Regadas Filho F, Vilarinho A, Morano D Tech Coloproctol. 2019; 24(1):65-73.

PMID: 31828573 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-019-02131-6.