» Articles » PMID: 15480868

[Novel Calcium Phosphate Formula for Filling Bone Defects. Initial in Vivo Long-term Results]

Overview
Date 2004 Oct 14
PMID 15480868
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Up to now hydroxyapatite (HA) and beta-tricalciumphosphate (beta-TCP) ceramics have been routinely sintered at temperatures between 1100 degrees and 1500 degrees C. Our new calcium ceramic is fabricated by a sol-gel process at 200 degrees C. The aim of this investigation was to test the biodegradation of and the induction of bone formation by this material.

Material And Methods: Eighteen 1-year-old Goettingen minipigs were divided into three groups. Critical size defects (>5 cm(3)) in the mandible were treated differently in all three animals (group 1: filling with 40% beta-TCP plus 60% HA, group 2: pure HA was applied, group 3 served as controls: only gelatinous material was given). Macroscopic and microscopic investigations of the former defects were made 8 months postoperatively. RESULTS. In groups 1 and 2 biodegradation of more than 93% of the new calcium phosphate formula was found 8 months postoperatively and considered to be very good. No difference was observed between pure HA (group 2) and the combination of HA and beta-TCP (group 1). In both groups complete bone formation was seen macroscopically in the former defects. In the control group only incomplete bone formation with 48.4% of the defect area was noted. This difference was significant ( p<0.001).

Discussion: The new calcium phosphate formula made by a sol-gel method at 120 degrees C seems to be suitable for filling bone defects and is of interest for orthopedic surgery, traumatology, craniomaxillofacial surgery, and dentistry.

Citing Articles

Investigation of a pre-clinical mandibular bone notch defect model in miniature pigs: clinical computed tomography, micro-computed tomography, and histological evaluation.

Carlisle P, Guda T, Silliman D, Lien W, Hale R, Brown Baer P J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016; 42(1):20-30.

PMID: 26904491 PMC: 4761569. DOI: 10.5125/jkaoms.2016.42.1.20.


Biomaterials for craniofacial reconstruction.

Neumann A, Kevenhoerster K GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011; 8:Doc08.

PMID: 22073101 PMC: 3199817. DOI: 10.3205/cto000060.


[Resorbable bone substitution materials: An overview of commercially available materials and new approaches in the field of composites].

Heinemann S, Gelinsky M, Worch H, Hanke T Orthopade. 2011; 40(9):761-73.

PMID: 21424299 DOI: 10.1007/s00132-011-1748-z.

References
1.
Koshino T, Murase T, Takagi T, Saito T . New bone formation around porous hydroxyapatite wedge implanted in opening wedge high tibial osteotomy in patients with osteoarthritis. Biomaterials. 2001; 22(12):1579-82. DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00318-5. View

2.
Artzi Z, Nemcovsky C, Tal H, Dayan D . Histopathological morphometric evaluation of 2 different hydroxyapatite-bone derivatives in sinus augmentation procedures: a comparative study in humans. J Periodontol. 2001; 72(7):911-20. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2001.72.7.911. View

3.
Petite H, Viateau V, Bensaid W, Meunier A, de Pollak C, Bourguignon M . Tissue-engineered bone regeneration. Nat Biotechnol. 2000; 18(9):959-63. DOI: 10.1038/79449. View

4.
Pistner H, Reuther J, Reinhart E, Kubler N, Priessnitz B . [New hydroxylapatite cement for craniofacial surgery]. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir. 1998; 2 Suppl 1:S37-40. DOI: 10.1007/PL00014476. View

5.
Jensen S, Aaboe M, Pinholt E, Hjorting-Hansen E, Melsen F, Ruyter I . Tissue reaction and material characteristics of four bone substitutes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996; 11(1):55-66. View