» Articles » PMID: 15469039

Why Do Some Countries Publish More Than Others? An International Comparison of Research Funding, English Proficiency and Publication Output in Highly Ranked General Medical Journals

Overview
Journal Eur J Epidemiol
Specialty Public Health
Date 2004 Oct 8
PMID 15469039
Citations 68
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

National factor(s) influencing publication output in the highest ranked medical journals are largely unknown. We sought to examine the relationship between national research funding and English proficiency on publication output. We identified all original research articles appearing in the five highest ranked general medical journals between 1997 and 2001. Using the country of the corresponding author as the source nation for each article, we determined a standardized publication rate across developed nations. We used multiple regression techniques to determine the influence of national expenditures on research and scores from the Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL), a surrogate for English proficiency, on publication output. There was a significant relationship of national spending on research and TOEFL scores to publication output of developed countries (p = 0.04; p < 0.01, respectively). These two variables explained approximately 71.5% of the variation in publication rate across developed nations around the world (R = 0.85; p < 0.01). Normalized for population size, English-speaking nations and certain northern European countries such as Denmark, The Netherlands, Switzerland, and Sweden had the highest rate of publication in the five highest ranked general medical journals, while Asian countries had generally low rates of publication. Research spending and English proficiency were strongly associated with publication output in the highest ranked general medical journals. While these data cannot be considered definitive due to their observational nature, they do suggest that for English-language medical journals, research funding and English proficiency may be important determinants of publication.

Citing Articles

Global Trends in the Value of Author Order Across Medical Publications: A Cross-Sectional Bibliometric Study.

Hashimoto H, Sekine M, Nishizaki Y, Aune D, Mizuno A, Homma Y Clin Transl Sci. 2025; 18(2):e70157.

PMID: 39945329 PMC: 11822671. DOI: 10.1111/cts.70157.


A systematic scoping review reveals that geographic and taxonomic patterns influence the scientific and societal interest in urban soil microbial diversity.

Masson S, Chialva M, Bongiovanni D, Adamo M, Stefanini I, Lanfranco L Environ Microbiome. 2025; 20(1):17.

PMID: 39905522 PMC: 11792354. DOI: 10.1186/s40793-025-00677-7.


Evidence base for non-genetic inheritance of environmental exposures in non-human animals and plants: a map of evidence syntheses with bibliometric analysis.

Macartney E, Drobniak S, Nakagawa S, Lagisz M Environ Evid. 2024; 12(1):1.

PMID: 39294796 PMC: 11378868. DOI: 10.1186/s13750-022-00290-y.


Global research trends on systemic lupus erythematosus and thyroid cancers (1964-2023): A scientometric and visualized study.

Alemi H, Khavandgar N, Oskouie I, Mardani-Fard H, Rostami T, AleTaha A Medicine (Baltimore). 2024; 103(26):e38511.

PMID: 38941389 PMC: 11466090. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038511.


Insight into the research history and trends of total anomalous pulmonary venous connection: a bibliometric analysis.

Wen C, Shen G, Fang C, Tian L J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024; 19(1):285.

PMID: 38730414 PMC: 11088122. DOI: 10.1186/s13019-024-02787-8.


References
1.
Kondro W . Canada outlines 10-year research strategy that will "take on the world". Lancet. 2002; 359(9307):684. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07839-X. View

2.
NAHRWOLD D, Pereira S, Dupuis J . United states research published in major surgical journals is decreasing. Ann Surg. 1995; 222(3):263-6; discussion 266-9. PMC: 1234803. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199509000-00005. View

3.
Garfield E . Journal impact factor: a brief review. CMAJ. 1999; 161(8):979-80. PMC: 1230709. View

4.
Frist W . Federal funding for biomedical research: commitment and benefits. JAMA. 2002; 287(13):1722-4. DOI: 10.1001/jama.287.13.1722. View

5.
Thompson J, Moskowitz J . Preventing the extinction of the clinical research ecosystem. JAMA. 1997; 278(3):241-5. View