» Articles » PMID: 15466312

Mismatch Between What is Expected and What Actually Occurs Triggers Memory Reconsolidation or Extinction

Overview
Journal Learn Mem
Specialty Neurology
Date 2004 Oct 7
PMID 15466312
Citations 123
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In previous experiments on contextual memory, we proposed that the unreinforced re-exposure to the learning context (conditioned stimulus, CS) acts as a switch guiding the memory course toward reconsolidation or extinction, depending on reminder duration. This proposal implies that the system computes the total exposure time to the context, from CS onset to CS offset, and therefore, that the reminder presentation must be terminated for the switching mechanism to become operative. Here we investigated to what extent this requirement is necessary, and we explored the relation between diverse phases in the reconsolidation and extinction processes. We used the contextual memory model of the crab Chasmagnathus which involves an association between the learning context (CS) and a visual danger stimulus (unconditioned stimulus, US). Administration of cycloheximide was used to test the lability state of memory at different time points. The results show that two factors, no-reinforcement during the reminder (i.e., CS re-exposure) and CS offset are the necessary conditions for both processes to occur. Regardless of the reminder duration, memory retrieved by unreinforced CS re-exposure emerges intact and consolidated when tested before CS offset, suggesting that neither reconsolidation nor extinction is concomitant with CS re-exposure. Either process could only be triggered once the definitive mismatch between CS and US is confirmed by CS termination without the expected reinforcement.

Citing Articles

Remission from addiction: erasing the wrong circuits or making new ones?.

Engeln M, Ahmed S Nat Rev Neurosci. 2024; 26(2):115-130.

PMID: 39663409 DOI: 10.1038/s41583-024-00886-y.


Social interaction-induced fear memory reduction: exploring the influence of dopamine and oxytocin receptors on memory updating.

Arellano Perez A, Kautzmann A, de Oliveira Alvares L Transl Psychiatry. 2024; 14(1):242.

PMID: 38844463 PMC: 11156639. DOI: 10.1038/s41398-024-02955-3.


Memory persistence: from fundamental mechanisms to translational opportunities.

Merlo S, Belluscio M, Eugenia Pedreira M, Merlo E Transl Psychiatry. 2024; 14(1):98.

PMID: 38355584 PMC: 10867010. DOI: 10.1038/s41398-024-02808-z.


Age-Related Differences in Motor Skill Transfer with Brief Memory Reactivation.

Tomlin K, Johnson B, Westlake K Brain Sci. 2024; 14(1).

PMID: 38248280 PMC: 10813682. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14010065.


Modulation of memory reconsolidation by adjacent novel tasks: timing defines the nature of change.

Schroeder M, Fullio C, Ballarini F, Moncada D Commun Biol. 2023; 6(1):1288.

PMID: 38114781 PMC: 10730840. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-05666-5.


References
1.
Sara S . Strengthening the shaky trace through retrieval. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001; 1(3):212-3. DOI: 10.1038/35044575. View

2.
Rescorla R . Behavioral studies of Pavlovian conditioning. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1988; 11:329-52. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ne.11.030188.001553. View

3.
Debiec J, LeDoux J, Nader K . Cellular and systems reconsolidation in the hippocampus. Neuron. 2002; 36(3):527-38. DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)01001-2. View

4.
Nader K, Schafe G, LeDoux J . The labile nature of consolidation theory. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001; 1(3):216-9. DOI: 10.1038/35044580. View

5.
Nadel L, Land C . Memory traces revisited. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001; 1(3):209-12. DOI: 10.1038/35044572. View