» Articles » PMID: 15461199

Ethnic Differences in Reported Smoking Behaviors in Face-to-face and Telephone Interviews

Overview
Journal Eur J Epidemiol
Specialty Public Health
Date 2004 Oct 6
PMID 15461199
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Different modes of gathering data on self-reported health measures and self-reported risk factors are used frequently in research. However, data on the influence of the mode of collection of data on self-reporting are limited. The aim of the study was to identify associations between the mode of data collection and self-reported smoking in two distinct ethnic groups, Jews and Arabs in Israel. During the last 2 years, data were collected in two national surveys regarding the smoking behaviors of Jews and Arabs in Israel. In the telephone surveys 4713 Israeli residents were interviewed and in the face-to-face interviewees 3239 people were interviewed. The interviewees were between the ages 25 and 64. There was no significant difference in smoking rates between face-to-face interviews and telephone interviews among Jewish men or women after adjusting for other variables associated with smoking. However, there was a difference between the two methods of data collection in the Arab population also after the adjustment. In this group, respondents tended to report more often being a smoker in the face-to-face interviews. This was especially apparent in Arab women. There was no significant difference in the reported number of cigarettes smoked in the two modes of data collection. In Arabs compared to Jews there is a significant difference between reporting smoking during a telephone interview and a face-to-face interview. The mode of data collection can affect comparisons between different groups.

Citing Articles

Association Between Risk Perceptions of COVID-19, Political Ideology, and Mask-Wearing Behavior After the Outbreak: A Cross-Sectional Survey in South Korea.

Lee S, Ham J, Park H, Jang D, Jang W Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024; 17:1659-1668.

PMID: 38915789 PMC: 11195682. DOI: 10.2147/RMHP.S463739.


A cross sectional survey assessing knowledge, attitudes and behaviors regarding brucellosis among Arab Israelis.

Baron-Epel O, Bord S, Cohen-Dar M, Obeid S BMC Public Health. 2018; 18(1):516.

PMID: 29669560 PMC: 5907357. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5430-9.


Differences in quality of life between Jewish and Arab patients on hemodialysis.

Romano-Zelekha O, Golan E, Ifrah A, Weinstein T, Shohat T Qual Life Res. 2017; 26(12):3343-3352.

PMID: 28791563 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-017-1661-y.


Tobacco use induces anti-apoptotic, proliferative patterns of gene expression in circulating leukocytes of Caucasian males.

Charles P, Alder B, Hilliard E, Schisler J, Lineberger R, Parker J BMC Med Genomics. 2008; 1:38.

PMID: 18710571 PMC: 2531187. DOI: 10.1186/1755-8794-1-38.

References
1.
Rintala D, Willems E . Telephone versus face-to-face mode for collecting self-reports of sequences of behavior. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991; 72(7):477-81. View

2.
Wilson K, Roe B, Wright L . Telephone or face-to-face interviews?: a decision made on the basis of a pilot study. Int J Nurs Stud. 1999; 35(6):314-21. DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7489(98)00044-3. View

3.
Potthoff R . Telephone sampling in epidemiologic research: to reap the benefits, avoid the pitfalls. Am J Epidemiol. 1994; 139(10):967-78. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116946. View

4.
OToole B, Battistutta D, Long A, Crouch K . A comparison of costs and data quality of three health survey methods: mail, telephone and personal home interview. Am J Epidemiol. 1986; 124(2):317-28. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114390. View

5.
Donovan R, Holman C, Corti B, Jalleh G . Face-to-face household interviews versus telephone interviews for health surveys. Aust N Z J Public Health. 1997; 21(2):134-40. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.1997.tb01672.x. View