» Articles » PMID: 15459317

Assigning African Elephant DNA to Geographic Region of Origin: Applications to the Ivory Trade

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2004 Oct 2
PMID 15459317
Citations 66
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Resurgence of illicit trade in African elephant ivory is placing the elephant at renewed risk. Regulation of this trade could be vastly improved by the ability to verify the geographic origin of tusks. We address this need by developing a combined genetic and statistical method to determine the origin of poached ivory. Our statistical approach exploits a smoothing method to estimate geographic-specific allele frequencies over the entire African elephants' range for 16 microsatellite loci, using 315 tissue and 84 scat samples from forest (Loxodonta africana cyclotis) and savannah (Loxodonta africana africana) elephants at 28 locations. These geographic-specific allele frequency estimates are used to infer the geographic origin of DNA samples, such as could be obtained from tusks of unknown origin. We demonstrate that our method alleviates several problems associated with standard assignment methods in this context, and the absolute accuracy of our method is high. Continent-wide, 50% of samples were located within 500 km, and 80% within 932 km of their actual place of origin. Accuracy varied by region (median accuracies: West Africa, 135 km; Central Savannah, 286 km; Central Forest, 411 km; South, 535 km; and East, 697 km). In some cases, allele frequencies vary considerably over small geographic regions, making much finer discriminations possible and suggesting that resolution could be further improved by collection of samples from locations not represented in our study.

Citing Articles

Jointly representing long-range genetic similarity and spatially heterogeneous isolation-by-distance.

Shastry V, Musiani M, Novembre J bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39990319 PMC: 11844421. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.10.637386.


A novel UPLC-based method to identify elephant and mammoth ivory.

Su C, Xie Y, Wang B, Cui L, Liu B, Zhou Y Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):5810.

PMID: 39962129 PMC: 11833092. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-89678-7.


Successful Traceability of Wildlife Samples Contributes to Wildlife Conservation: A Case Study of Tracing the Snub-Nosed Monkey ( spp.).

Wang X, Shen Y, Teng Y, Wu R, Liu S, Zhao J Animals (Basel). 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 39858174 PMC: 11758607. DOI: 10.3390/ani15020174.


Approaches to tracing the geographic origin of wildlife trade.

Gu T, Zhang H, He Y, Hu J, Yu L Natl Sci Rev. 2024; 11(9):nwae286.

PMID: 39350936 PMC: 11441321. DOI: 10.1093/nsr/nwae286.


Evaluating evidence for co-geography in the Anopheles-Plasmodium host-parasite system.

Rehmann C, Ralph P, Kern A G3 (Bethesda). 2024; 14(3).

PMID: 38230808 PMC: 10917517. DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkae008.


References
1.
Barriel V, Thuet E, Tassy P . Molecular phylogeny of Elephantidae. Extreme divergence of the extant forest African elephant. C R Acad Sci III. 1999; 322(6):447-54. DOI: 10.1016/s0764-4469(99)80093-6. View

2.
Nyakaana S, Arctander P . Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci in the African elephant, Loxodonta africana. Mol Ecol. 1998; 7(10):1436-7. View

3.
Eggert L, Rasner C, Woodruff D . The evolution and phylogeography of the African elephant inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequence and nuclear microsatellite markers. Proc Biol Sci. 2002; 269(1504):1993-2006. PMC: 1691127. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2070. View

4.
Roca A, Georgiadis N, Pecon-Slattery J, OBrien S . Genetic evidence for two species of elephant in Africa. Science. 2001; 293(5534):1473-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.1059936. View

5.
Anderson E, Thompson E . A model-based method for identifying species hybrids using multilocus genetic data. Genetics. 2002; 160(3):1217-29. PMC: 1462008. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/160.3.1217. View