» Articles » PMID: 15452069

Effects of Pirenzepine on Pupil Size and Accommodation in Rhesus Monkeys

Overview
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2004 Sep 29
PMID 15452069
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Pirenzepine is suggested to be a relatively selective muscarinic (M(1)) antagonist and is currently under investigation for the treatment of myopia. Atropine, a nonselective M-type antagonist, is used in the treatment of myopia, but has undesired ocular and systemic side effects. An M(1)-specific antagonist may decrease side effects and remain effective at reducing the progression of myopia. In the current study, the effects of pirenzepine on pupil diameter, resting refraction, and accommodation were studied in rhesus monkeys.

Methods: The time course and extent of mydriasis from subconjunctival injection of 2% pirenzepine were determined in five normal rhesus monkeys, and the effects on static and dynamic accommodation were determined in four rhesus monkeys with permanent indwelling electrodes in the Edinger-Westphal (EW) nucleus of the midbrain. Subconjunctival injections of 0.0002% to 0.2% pirenzepine in log unit dilutions were tested in three monkeys to determine the effects on static EW-stimulated accommodation. At 40 to 50 minutes after pirenzepine injection, accommodation was stimulated pharmacologically in both eyes, and the response was measured for 30 minutes.

Results: After 2% pirenzepine injection, pupil size increased 2.02 +/- 0.41 mm, there was a hyperopic shift in resting refraction of 1.07 +/- 0.23 D, and nearly complete cycloplegia occurred. Maximum EW-stimulated accommodation was significantly decreased 20 to 40 minutes after 0.02% or greater pirenzepine. Carbachol-stimulated accommodation was significantly decreased after 0.2% or greater pirenzepine.

Conclusions: Subconjunctival injections of 0.02% or greater pirenzepine result in a significant decrease in accommodation and are probably acting through nonselective muscarinic antagonism. Subconjunctival injections of 0.002% or less pirenzepine do not decrease EW-stimulated accommodation.

Citing Articles

Retardation of myopia by atropine regimes.

Zhu Q, Chen L, Liang J, Hu M, Xue L, Zhou G Int J Ophthalmol. 2024; 17(11):2129-2140.

PMID: 39559301 PMC: 11528274. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2024.11.20.


A Spontaneous Nonhuman Primate Model of Myopic Foveoschisis.

Sin T, Kim S, Li Y, Wang J, Chen R, Chung S Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2023; 64(1):18.

PMID: 36689233 PMC: 9896856. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.64.1.18.


Current concepts in the management of childhood myopia.

Dhiman R, Rakheja V, Gupta V, Saxena R Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022; 70(8):2800-2815.

PMID: 35918919 PMC: 9672783. DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2098_21.


Epiregulin, epigen and betacellulin antibodies and axial elongation in young guinea pigs with lens-induced myopization.

Dong L, Zhang R, Zhou W, Li Y, Li H, Wu H BMC Ophthalmol. 2022; 22(1):193.

PMID: 35477375 PMC: 9044769. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-022-02417-8.


IMI - Report on Experimental Models of Emmetropization and Myopia.

Troilo D, Smith 3rd E, Nickla D, Ashby R, Tkatchenko A, Ostrin L Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019; 60(3):M31-M88.

PMID: 30817827 PMC: 6738517. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.18-25967.


References
1.
Choppin A, Eglen R . Pharmacological characterization of muscarinic receptors in dog isolated ciliary and urinary bladder smooth muscle. Br J Pharmacol. 2001; 132(4):835-42. PMC: 1572633. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703901. View

2.
Syniuta L, Isenberg S . Atropine and bifocals can slow the progression of myopia in children. Binocul Vis Strabismus Q. 2001; 16(3):203-8. View

3.
Chiang M, Kouzis A, Pointer R, Repka M . Treatment of childhood myopia with atropine eyedrops and bifocal spectacles. Binocul Vis Strabismus Q. 2001; 16(3):209-15. View

4.
Vilupuru A, Glasser A . Dynamic accommodation in rhesus monkeys. Vision Res. 2002; 42(1):125-41. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00260-7. View

5.
Truong H, Cottriall C, Gentle A, McBrien N . Pirenzepine affects scleral metabolic changes in myopia through a non-toxic mechanism. Exp Eye Res. 2002; 74(1):103-11. DOI: 10.1006/exer.2001.1107. View