» Articles » PMID: 15451698

Tuning of Strouhal Number for High Propulsive Efficiency Accurately Predicts How Wingbeat Frequency and Stroke Amplitude Relate and Scale with Size and Flight Speed in Birds

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2004 Sep 29
PMID 15451698
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The wing kinematics of birds vary systematically with body size, but we still, after several decades of research, lack a clear mechanistic understanding of the aerodynamic selection pressures that shape them. Swimming and flying animals have recently been shown to cruise at Strouhal numbers (St) corresponding to a regime of vortex growth and shedding in which the propulsive efficiency of flapping foils peaks (St approximately fA/U, where f is wingbeat frequency, U is cruising speed and A approximately bsin(theta/2) is stroke amplitude, in which b is wingspan and theta is stroke angle). We show that St is a simple and accurate predictor of wingbeat frequency in birds. The Strouhal numbers of cruising birds have converged on the lower end of the range 0.2 < St < 0.4 associated with high propulsive efficiency. Stroke angle scales as theta approximately 67b-0.24, so wingbeat frequency can be predicted as f approximately St.U/bsin(33.5b-0.24), with St0.21 and St0.25 for direct and intermittent fliers, respectively. This simple aerodynamic model predicts wingbeat frequency better than any other relationship proposed to date, explaining 90% of the observed variance in a sample of 60 bird species. Avian wing kinematics therefore appear to have been tuned by natural selection for high aerodynamic efficiency: physical and physiological constraints upon wing kinematics must be reconsidered in this light.

Citing Articles

Behavior and biomechanics: flapping frequency during tandem and solo flights of cliff swallows.

Chizhikova S, Mendez L, Hedrick T J Exp Biol. 2024; 228(1.

PMID: 39676590 PMC: 11708819. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.249393.


How oscillating aerodynamic forces explain the timbre of the hummingbird's hum and other animals in flapping flight.

Hightower B, Wijnings P, Scholte R, Ingersoll R, Chin D, Nguyen J Elife. 2021; 10.

PMID: 33724182 PMC: 8055270. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.63107.


Alcids 'fly' at efficient Strouhal numbers in both air and water but vary stroke velocity and angle.

Lapsansky A, Zatz D, Tobalske B Elife. 2020; 9.

PMID: 32602463 PMC: 7332295. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.55774.


Extreme temperature combined with hypoxia, affects swimming performance in brown trout ().

Nudds R, Ozolina K, Fenkes M, Wearing O, Shiels H Conserv Physiol. 2020; 8(1):coz108.

PMID: 31988750 PMC: 6977409. DOI: 10.1093/conphys/coz108.


Phylogenetic and kinematic constraints on avian flight signals.

Berg K, Delgado S, Mata-Betancourt A Proc Biol Sci. 2019; 286(1911):20191083.

PMID: 31530147 PMC: 6784729. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.1083.


References
1.
Taylor G, Nudds R, Thomas A . Flying and swimming animals cruise at a Strouhal number tuned for high power efficiency. Nature. 2003; 425(6959):707-11. DOI: 10.1038/nature02000. View

2.
Rohr J, Fish F . Strouhal numbers and optimization of swimming by odontocete cetaceans. J Exp Biol. 2004; 207(Pt 10):1633-42. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.00948. View

3.
Spedding G, Rosen M, Hedenstrom A . A family of vortex wakes generated by a thrush nightingale in free flight in a wind tunnel over its entire natural range of flight speeds. J Exp Biol. 2003; 206(Pt 14):2313-44. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.00423. View

4.
Pennycuick . Wingbeat frequency of birds in steady cruising flight: new data and improved predictions. J Exp Biol. 1996; 199(Pt 7):1613-8. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.199.7.1613. View

5.
Pennycuick C . Speeds and wingbeat frequencies of migrating birds compared with calculated benchmarks. J Exp Biol. 2001; 204(Pt 19):3283-94. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.204.19.3283. View