» Articles » PMID: 15448185

Solving the Riddle of Codon Usage Preferences: a Test for Translational Selection

Overview
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2004 Sep 28
PMID 15448185
Citations 405
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Translational selection is responsible for the unequal usage of synonymous codons in protein coding genes in a wide variety of organisms. It is one of the most subtle and pervasive forces of molecular evolution, yet, establishing the underlying causes for its idiosyncratic behaviour across living kingdoms has proven elusive to researchers over the past 20 years. In this study, a statistical model for measuring translational selection in any given genome is developed, and the test is applied to 126 fully sequenced genomes, ranging from archaea to eukaryotes. It is shown that tRNA gene redundancy and genome size are interacting forces that ultimately determine the action of translational selection, and that an optimal genome size exists for which this kind of selection is maximal. Accordingly, genome size also presents upper and lower boundaries beyond which selection on codon usage is not possible. We propose a model where the coevolution of genome size and tRNA genes explains the observed patterns in translational selection in all living organisms. This model finally unifies our understanding of codon usage across prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Helicobacter pylori, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Homo sapiens are codon usage paradigms that can be better understood under the proposed model.

Citing Articles

Genes and Pathways Comprising the Human and Mouse ORFeomes Display Distinct Codon Bias Signatures that Can Regulate Protein Levels.

Davis E, Raman R, Byrne S, Ghanegolmohammadi F, Mathur C, Begley U bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39974974 PMC: 11838421. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.03.636209.


An Ultimate Question for Functional A-to-I mRNA Editing: Why Not a Genomic G?.

Xie Q, Duan Y J Mol Evol. 2025; .

PMID: 39964487 DOI: 10.1007/s00239-025-10238-8.


A study on the codon usage bias of arenavirus common genes.

Thomas P, Ferrer M, Lozano M, Gomez R Front Microbiol. 2025; 15:1490076.

PMID: 39917269 PMC: 11799557. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1490076.


Engineering a genomically recoded organism with one stop codon.

Grome M, Nguyen M, Moonan D, Mohler K, Gurara K, Wang S Nature. 2025; 639(8054):512-521.

PMID: 39910296 PMC: 11903333. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-08501-x.


Modeling coding sequence design for virus-based expression in tobacco.

Burghardt M, Tuller T Synth Syst Biotechnol. 2025; 10(2):337-345.

PMID: 39802156 PMC: 11718241. DOI: 10.1016/j.synbio.2024.12.002.


References
1.
Moszer I, Rocha E, Danchin A . Codon usage and lateral gene transfer in Bacillus subtilis. Curr Opin Microbiol. 1999; 2(5):524-8. DOI: 10.1016/s1369-5274(99)00011-9. View

2.
McInerney J . Replicational and transcriptional selection on codon usage in Borrelia burgdorferi. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998; 95(18):10698-703. PMC: 27958. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.18.10698. View

3.
Kanaya S, Yamada Y, Kinouchi M, Kudo Y, Ikemura T . Codon usage and tRNA genes in eukaryotes: correlation of codon usage diversity with translation efficiency and with CG-dinucleotide usage as assessed by multivariate analysis. J Mol Evol. 2001; 53(4-5):290-8. DOI: 10.1007/s002390010219. View

4.
Urrutia A, Hurst L . Codon usage bias covaries with expression breadth and the rate of synonymous evolution in humans, but this is not evidence for selection. Genetics. 2001; 159(3):1191-9. PMC: 1461876. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/159.3.1191. View

5.
Bernstein J, Khodursky A, Lin P, Lin-Chao S, Cohen S . Global analysis of mRNA decay and abundance in Escherichia coli at single-gene resolution using two-color fluorescent DNA microarrays. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99(15):9697-702. PMC: 124983. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.112318199. View