» Articles » PMID: 15375790

Hypoglycemic Potential of Nateglinide Versus Glyburide in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Overview
Journal Metabolism
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2004 Sep 18
PMID 15375790
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Antidiabetic agents that augment insulin secretion can cause hypoglycemia. With the current trend toward early and aggressive treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes, the hypoglycemic potential of insulinotropic agents is of concern. This study aimed to compare the propensity of the "glinide," nateglinide, and the sulfonylurea (SU), glyburide, to elicit hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetic patients with moderately elevated fasting plasma glucose (FPG). Hyperglycemic clamps (target plasma glucose = 11.1 mmol/L) were initiated, and 30 minutes later patients received a single oral dose of nateglinide (120 mg, n = 15) or glyburide (10 mg, n = 12) in a double-blind fashion. At the end of the 2-hour clamp when the glucose infusion was terminated, plasma glucose and insulin levels were measured for 4 additional hours. The minimum plasma glucose level achieved after terminating the glucose infusion (glucose nadir) was used as an index of hypoglycemic potential. The mean (+/-SEM) glucose nadir was significantly lower in patients given glyburide (3.3 +/- 0.2 mmol/L) versus nateglinide (4.4 +/- 0.3 mmol/L, P = .025). Confirmed hypoglycemia (plasma glucose < or = 2.8 mmol/L) occurred in 2 of 12 patients given glyburide and in none of those given nateglinide. Plasma insulin levels were significantly higher from 100 to 240 minutes after clamp termination in patients given glyburide versus nateglinide. Nateglinide has less hypoglycemic potential than glyburide, suggesting that nateglinide may be a more appropriate insulinotropic agent for patients with moderate fasting hyperglycemia, such as elderly patients and those with comorbid cardiac ischemia.

Citing Articles

Update on the management of diabetes in long-term care facilities.

Idrees T, Castro-Revoredo I, Migdal A, Moreno E, Umpierrez G BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2022; 10(4).

PMID: 35858714 PMC: 9305812. DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002705.


Treatment options to prevent diabetes in subjects with prediabetes: Efficacy, cost effectiveness and future outlook.

Farr O, Mantzoros C Metabolism. 2017; 70:192-195.

PMID: 28095990 PMC: 5871912. DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2016.12.017.


Comparison of sitagliptin with nateglinide on postprandial glucose and related hormones in drug-naïve Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A pilot study.

Tanimoto M, Kanazawa A, Hirose T, Yoshihara T, Kobayashi-Kimura S, Nakanishi R J Diabetes Investig. 2015; 6(5):560-6.

PMID: 26417414 PMC: 4578496. DOI: 10.1111/jdi.12338.


Comparison of nateglinide and gliclazide in combination with metformin, for treatment of patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on maximum doses of metformin alone.

Ristic S, Collober-Maugeais C, Pecher E, Cressier F Diabet Med. 2006; 23(7):757-62.

PMID: 16842480 PMC: 1569640. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01914.x.