» Articles » PMID: 15365810

Resource Partitioning Through Oceanic Segregation of Foraging Juvenile Southern Elephant Seals ( Mirounga Leonina)

Overview
Journal Oecologia
Date 2004 Sep 15
PMID 15365810
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In highly dynamic and unpredictable environments such as the Southern Ocean, species that have evolved behaviors that reduce the effects of intra-specific competition may have a selective advantage. This is particularly true when juveniles face disadvantages when foraging due to morphological or physiological limitation, which is the case for many marine mammals. We tracked the at-sea movements of 48 juvenile southern elephant seals ( Mirounga leonina) between the ages of 1 and 4 years from the population at Macquarie Island using locations derived from recorded light levels. There were significant differences in the total amount of the Southern Ocean covered by the different age-groups. The younger seals used a smaller area than the older seals. On average, the younger individuals also made more trips to sea than the older seals and did not travel as far on each trip. Females spent more time at sea than males and there were no significant differences between the total areas used by male and females. In summary, younger seals remained closer to the island at all times, and they spent more time in more northerly regions that older seals. These differences in behavior created temporal and spatial segregation between juveniles of different ages. Therefore, we suggest that these temporal and spatial separations help to avoid intra-specific competition for resources on land, space on beaches, and at-sea foraging areas. Such modifications of haul-out timing and behavior enable them to exploit a patchy and unpredictable environment.

Citing Articles

Extreme polygyny results in intersex differences in age-dependent survival of a highly dimorphic marine mammal.

Volzke S, Cleeland J, Hindell M, Corney S, Wotherspoon S, McMahon C R Soc Open Sci. 2023; 10(3):221635.

PMID: 36968236 PMC: 10031410. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.221635.


The role of allochrony in influencing interspecific differences in foraging distribution during the non-breeding season between two congeneric crested penguin species.

Green C, Ratcliffe N, Mattern T, Thompson D, Lea M, Wotherspoon S PLoS One. 2022; 17(2):e0262901.

PMID: 35139102 PMC: 8827451. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262901.


Sex, body size, and boldness shape the seasonal foraging habitat selection in southern elephant seals.

Allegue H, Guinet C, Patrick S, Hindell M, McMahon C, Reale D Ecol Evol. 2022; 12(1):e8457.

PMID: 35127010 PMC: 8796948. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8457.


Climate influences on female survival in a declining population of southern elephant seals ().

Volzke S, McMahon C, Hindell M, Burton H, Wotherspoon S Ecol Evol. 2021; 11(16):11333-11344.

PMID: 34429922 PMC: 8366891. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7919.


Inter- and intrasex habitat partitioning in the highly dimorphic southern elephant seal.

Hindell M, McMahon C, Jonsen I, Harcourt R, Arce F, Guinet C Ecol Evol. 2021; 11(4):1620-1633.

PMID: 33613994 PMC: 7882946. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7147.


References
1.
Williams R, Martinez N . Simple rules yield complex food webs. Nature. 2000; 404(6774):180-3. DOI: 10.1038/35004572. View

2.
Field I, Bradshaw C, McMahon C, Harrington J, Burton H . Effects of age, size and condition of elephant seals (Mirounga leonina) on their intravenous anaesthesia with tiletamine and zolazepam. Vet Rec. 2002; 151(8):235-40. DOI: 10.1136/vr.151.8.235. View

3.
Wikelski M, Wrege P . Niche expansion, body size, and survival in Galápagos marine iguanas. Oecologia. 2017; 124(1):107-115. DOI: 10.1007/s004420050030. View

4.
Bolnick D, Svanback R, Fordyce J, Yang L, Davis J, Hulsey C . The ecology of individuals: incidence and implications of individual specialization. Am Nat. 2003; 161(1):1-28. DOI: 10.1086/343878. View

5.
Buttemer W, Dawson W . Temporal pattern of foraging and microhabitat use by Galápagos marine iguanas, Amblyrhynchus cristatus. Oecologia. 2017; 96(1):56-64. DOI: 10.1007/BF00318031. View