» Articles » PMID: 15349748

Urolithiasis in Enterocystoplasties

Overview
Journal World J Urol
Specialty Urology
Date 2004 Sep 7
PMID 15349748
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The incidence of stones in patients with enterocystoplasty is reported as 12-52.5%. Most patients will have multiple physical factors such as immobility, need for self catheterisation and poor urine drainage, so that it is not certain that an intestinal reservoir is the cause of stones on its own. There is little or no evidence that mucus is an aetiological factor. Foreign bodies in the reservoir, such as staples, increase the risk of stone formation from 13% to 43%. Stones require surgical removal. Minimally invasive techniques may be used for small stones. A low velocity disintegrator is required so that fragments are not propelled into the intestinal mucosa. Stones are infective in origin in 86% of cases, but 14% are sterile. Metabolic screen shows that 80% of patients have risk factors for at least three different types of stone. All patients have raised pH (mean 6.93) and hypocitraturia. Raised serum and urinary calcium, hyperoxaluria and hyperuricosuria are found in up to 33% of patients.

Citing Articles

A challenging case of a multiple large stones in enterocystoplasty: a case report.

Kadouri Y, Lakssir J, Elaboudi A, El Sayegh H, Nouini Y Pan Afr Med J. 2024; 48:116.

PMID: 39545029 PMC: 11561746. DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2024.48.116.43987.


BLADDER TRANSPLANTATION: THE NEW FRONTIER IN ABDOMINAL ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION.

Piovesan A, Andraus W, Pellanda A, David Neto E, D Albuquerque L, Nahas W Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2024; 37:e1808.

PMID: 38896703 PMC: 11182627. DOI: 10.1590/0102-6720202400015e1808.


Paediatric cystolitholapaxy using mini PCNL-kit through the Mitrofanoff stoma.

Sakly A, Zakhama W, Mahjoubi Z, Sidhom W, Lahouel Y, Mnasser A Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021; 62:88-91.

PMID: 33505678 PMC: 7815490. DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.01.007.


Long-term complications following bladder augmentations in patients with spina bifida: bladder calculi, perforation of the augmented bladder and upper tract deterioration.

Husmann D Transl Androl Urol. 2016; 5(1):3-11.

PMID: 26904407 PMC: 4739984. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2015.12.06.


Urolithiasis in adult spina bifida patients: study in 260 patients and discussion of the literature.

Veenboer P, Bosch J, van Asbeck F, de Kort L Int Urol Nephrol. 2013; 45(3):695-702.

PMID: 23604705 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-013-0445-8.


References
1.
Palmer L, Franco I, Kogan S, Reda E, Gill B, Levitt S . Urolithiasis in children following augmentation cystoplasty. J Urol. 1993; 150(2 Pt 2):726-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35598-2. View

2.
Osther P, Poulsen A, Steven K . Stone risk after bladder substitution with the ileal-urethral Kock reservoir. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2000; 34(4):257-61. DOI: 10.1080/003655900750041997. View

3.
Mathoera R, Kok D, Nijman R . Bladder calculi in augmentation cystoplasty in children. Urology. 2000; 56(3):482-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00663-4. View

4.
Leonard M, Dharamsi N, Williot P . Outcome of gastrocystoplasty in tertiary pediatric urology practice. J Urol. 2000; 164(3 Pt 2):947-50. DOI: 10.1097/00005392-200009020-00007. View

5.
Silver R, Gros D, Jeffs R, Gearhart J . Urolithiasis in the exstrophy-epispadias complex. J Urol. 1997; 158(3 Pt 2):1322-6. DOI: 10.1097/00005392-199709000-00175. View