» Articles » PMID: 15348799

Responses of Bone to Titania-hydroxyapatite Composite and Nacreous Implants: a Preliminary Comparison by in Situ Hybridization

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2004 Sep 7
PMID 15348799
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The effect of two biomaterials on bone formation in vivo by in situ hybridization, was compared by using RNA probes complementary to collagen alpha1(I) RNA, osteonectin RNA and osteocalcin RNA. Holes were drilled into the midshafts of rat femurs. Titania-hydroxyapatite composite (THA) or nacre cylinders were implanted and the bone-implant regions collected 14 days after operation. Cuboidal osteoblasts, intensely labelled with the three probes, were seen to be lining the newly formed bone surrounding the THA implant. Between the implant and the new bone, a layer of un-labelled, apparently non-osteogenic cells was observed. By contrast, the nacre implant was bonded to the newly formed bone without any soft tissue interference. Osteoblasts lining the distal surface of the newly formed bone were stained with all three RNA probes, although weaker than in the THA sample. Some of the osteoblasts were flattened. We concluded from the appearance of the osteoblasts that the bone formation in the nacre samples had progressed beyond the phase of maximal synthetic activity. Around the THA implant, the labelling indicated that bone-forming activity was still high. It was concluded that the bioactivity of nacre was higher than that of THA.

Citing Articles

Induction of Osseointegration by Nacre in Pigs.

Leelatian L, Chunhabundit P, Charoonrut P, Asvanund P Molecules. 2022; 27(9).

PMID: 35566000 PMC: 9105096. DOI: 10.3390/molecules27092653.


Extraction, Purification, Bioactivities and Application of Matrix Proteins From Pearl Powder and Nacre Powder: A Review.

Pei J, Wang Y, Zou X, Ruan H, Tang C, Liao J Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021; 9:649665.

PMID: 33959598 PMC: 8095667. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.649665.


Identifying genes and regulatory pathways associated with the scleractinian coral calcification process.

Gutner-Hoch E, Waldman Ben-Asher H, Yam R, Shemesh A, Levy O PeerJ. 2017; 5:e3590.

PMID: 28740755 PMC: 5522607. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.3590.


Nacre-driven water-soluble factors promote wound healing of the deep burn porcine skin by recovering angiogenesis and fibroblast function.

Lee K, Kim H, Kim J, Chung Y, Lee T, Lim H Mol Biol Rep. 2011; 39(3):3211-8.

PMID: 21688145 DOI: 10.1007/s11033-011-1088-4.


Electrophoretic deposition of biomaterials.

Boccaccini A, Keim S, Ma R, Li Y, Zhitomirsky I J R Soc Interface. 2010; 7 Suppl 5:S581-613.

PMID: 20504802 PMC: 2952181. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2010.0156.focus.


References
1.
Zhou H, Choong P, McCarthy R, Chou S, Martin T, Ng K . In situ hybridization to show sequential expression of osteoblast gene markers during bone formation in vivo. J Bone Miner Res. 1994; 9(9):1489-99. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650090922. View

2.
Muller-Mai C, Voigt C, Knarse W, Sela J, Gross U . The early host and material response of bone-bonding and non-bonding glass-ceramic implants as revealed by scanning electron microscopy and histochemistry. Biomaterials. 1991; 12(9):865-71. DOI: 10.1016/0142-9612(91)90076-m. View

3.
Hulshoff J, van Dijk K, Van Der Waerden J, Wolke J, Kalk W, Jansen J . Evaluation of plasma-spray and magnetron-sputter Ca-P-coated implants: an in vivo experiment using rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res. 1996; 31(3):329-37. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199607)31:3<329::AID-JBM6>3.0.CO;2-O. View

4.
Karimbux N, Sirakian A, Weber H, Nishimura I . A new animal model for molecular biological analysis of the implant-tissue interface: spatial expression of type XII collagen mRNA around a titanium oral implant. J Oral Implantol. 1995; 21(2):107-13; discussion 114-5. View

5.
Yamada Y, Kuhn K, de Crombrugghe B . A conserved nucleotide sequence, coding for a segment of the C-propeptide, is found at the same location in different collagen genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983; 11(9):2733-44. PMC: 325920. DOI: 10.1093/nar/11.9.2733. View