» Articles » PMID: 15333537

Securing Central Venous Catheters: a Comparison of Sutures with Staples

Overview
Journal Emerg Med J
Specialty Emergency Medicine
Date 2004 Aug 31
PMID 15333537
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Central venous access permits rapid drug delivery to the central circulation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Central venous catheters must be secured in place to prevent accidental removal and sutures are often used for this purpose. Staples may offer advantages over sutures by reducing the time needed to secure the central venous catheter and reducing exposure to contaminated sharps. The purpose of this study was to assess a staple anchoring device (Arrow, Reading, USA) and compare it with sutures for securing central venous catheters.

Methods: Prospective, randomised trial of 20 patients requiring insertion of a central venous catheter during elective surgery.

Results: Mean (SD) times were significantly shorter in the staples group than in the sutures group (staples 10.1 (3.5) seconds; sutures 50.5 (9.6) seconds; p<0.0001). However, 3 of 10 central venous catheters in the staples group were accidentally pulled out within the first three days.

Conclusions: The use of staples significantly reduces the time to secure a central venous catheter. However, staples failed to secure the central venous catheters adequately and therefore cannot be recommended instead of sutures.

Citing Articles

Recent advances in biopolymer-based hemostatic materials.

Mecwan M, Li J, Falcone N, Ermis M, Torres E, Morales R Regen Biomater. 2022; 9:rbac063.

PMID: 36196294 PMC: 9522468. DOI: 10.1093/rb/rbac063.


Effectiveness of different central venous catheter fixation suture techniques: An in vitro crossover study.

Struck M, Friedrich L, Schleifenbaum S, Kirsten H, Schummer W, Winkler B PLoS One. 2019; 14(9):e0222463.

PMID: 31513685 PMC: 6742355. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222463.


Catheter Securement Systems for Peripherally Inserted and Nontunneled Central Vascular Access Devices: Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Sutureless Device.

Krenik K, Smith G, Bernatchez S J Infus Nurs. 2016; 39(4):210-7.

PMID: 27379679 PMC: 4935536. DOI: 10.1097/NAN.0000000000000174.


Catheter securement systems: comparison of two investigational devices to a sutureless securement device, a securement dressing, and sutures in a pig model.

Rutledge L, DeCabooter D, Walters S, Bernatchez S Intensive Care Med Exp. 2015; 3(1):60.

PMID: 26307415 PMC: 4549365. DOI: 10.1186/s40635-015-0060-3.