Minimizing the Use of Restrictive Devices in Dementia Patients at Risk for Falling
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
The accumulating empirical evidence demonstrates that restrictive devices can be removed without negative consequences. Most importantly, use of nonrestrictive measures has been correlated with positive patient outcomes and represents care that is dignified and safe for confused elders. Most of these nonrestrictive approaches promote mobility and functional recovery; however, testing of individual interventions is needed to further the science. As the research regarding restrictive devices has been translated into professional guidelines and regulatory standards, the prevalence of usage has declined dramatically. New institutional models of care discouraging routine use of restrictive devices also will foster innovative solutions to clinical problems associated with dementia.
Kamdar B, Fine J, Pavini M, Ardren S, Burns S, Bates J J Intensive Care Soc. 2024; 25(1):24-29.
PMID: 39323600 PMC: 11421263. DOI: 10.1177/17511437231182503.
Cheung J, Tam E, Mak A, Chan T, Zheng Y Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(4).
PMID: 35206290 PMC: 8872318. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19042103.
Variation of the Occurrence of Physical Restraint Use in the Long-Term Care: A Scoping Review.
Ambrosi E, Debiasi M, Longhini J, Giori L, Saiani L, Mezzalira E Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(22).
PMID: 34831674 PMC: 8622316. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182211918.
Kalula S, Petros S Curationis. 2017; 39(1):e1-e8.
PMID: 28155298 PMC: 6091560. DOI: 10.4102/curationis.v39i1.1605.
Deaths due to physical restraint.
Berzlanovich A, Schopfer J, Keil W Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012; 109(3):27-32.
PMID: 22334818 PMC: 3272587. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2012.0027.