» Articles » PMID: 15330708

Lateral Interactions in the Perception of Flicker and in the Physiology of the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus

Overview
Journal J Vis
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2004 Aug 28
PMID 15330708
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The perception of flicker strength in a center stimulus can be affected by the presence of a surrounding stimulus. We correlated this effect with the interactions between centers and surrounds of the receptive fields (RFs) of neurons in the retino-geniculate pathways. The responses of cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) of two New World monkey species, the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus), and the owl monkey (Aotus azarae) were measured to two spatially non-overlapping sinusoidally modulating luminance stimuli of equal temporal frequency, one of which mainly stimulated the RF center, the other the RF surround. The relative temporal phase between the center and surround stimuli was varied. The response amplitude as a function of relative phase between the center and surround stimuli can be described by a simple model where the RF center and surround responses are vector-added. A minimal response was reached for stimuli in which the surround stimulus led the center stimulus, indicating that the RF surround response lagged the center response. The flicker strength in the center stimulus perceived by human observers was measured psychophysically. It was found that the perceived flicker strength could be described by the same function as was used for the cell data. There were qualitative similarities between the physiological and the psychophysical data, suggesting that the physiological basis of the psychophysically measured spatial interactions is present as early as the LGN. The data indicated the presence of a nonlinearity in center-surround interactions that is influenced by the stimulus contrast. The possible source of this nonlinearity was studied by comparing the center and the surround responses with those in which they were selectively stimulated.

Citing Articles

Visual Contextual Effects of Orientation, Contrast, Flicker, and Luminance: All Are Affected by Normal Aging.

Nguyen B, McKendrick A Front Aging Neurosci. 2016; 8:79.

PMID: 27148047 PMC: 4834301. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00079.


A simpler primate brain: the visual system of the marmoset monkey.

Solomon S, Rosa M Front Neural Circuits. 2014; 8:96.

PMID: 25152716 PMC: 4126041. DOI: 10.3389/fncir.2014.00096.


Eye movements and the neural basis of context effects on visual sensitivity.

Ennis R, Cao D, Lee B, Zaidi Q J Neurosci. 2014; 34(24):8119-29.

PMID: 24920617 PMC: 4051970. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1048-14.2014.


Separating monocular and binocular neural mechanisms mediating chromatic contextual interactions.

DAntona A, Christiansen J, Shevell S J Vis. 2014; 14(4).

PMID: 24744449 PMC: 3993201. DOI: 10.1167/14.4.13.


Joint entropy for space and spatial frequency domains estimated from psychometric functions of achromatic discrimination.

Silveira V, Souza G, Gomes B, Rodrigues A, de Lima Silveira L PLoS One. 2014; 9(1):e86579.

PMID: 24466158 PMC: 3900586. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086579.