» Articles » PMID: 15315995

Fluoxetine, Cognitive-behavioral Therapy, and Their Combination for Adolescents with Depression: Treatment for Adolescents With Depression Study (TADS) Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Journal JAMA
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2004 Aug 19
PMID 15315995
Citations 460
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Context: Initial treatment of major depressive disorder in adolescents may include cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) or a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). However, little is known about their relative or combined effectiveness.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of 4 treatments among adolescents with major depressive disorder.

Design, Setting, And Participants: Randomized controlled trial of a volunteer sample of 439 patients between the ages of 12 to 17 years with a primary Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, diagnosis of major depressive disorder. The trial was conducted at 13 US academic and community clinics between spring 2000 and summer 2003.

Interventions: Twelve weeks of (1) fluoxetine alone (10 to 40 mg/d), (2) CBT alone, (3) CBT with fluoxetine (10 to 40 mg/d), or (4) placebo (equivalent to 10 to 40 mg/d). Placebo and fluoxetine alone were administered double-blind; CBT alone and CBT with fluoxetine were administered unblinded.

Main Outcome Measures: Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised total score and, for responder analysis, a (dichotomized) Clinical Global Impressions improvement score.

Results: Compared with placebo, the combination of fluoxetine with CBT was statistically significant (P =.001) on the Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised. Compared with fluoxetine alone (P =.02) and CBT alone (P =.01), treatment of fluoxetine with CBT was superior. Fluoxetine alone is a superior treatment to CBT alone (P =.01). Rates of response for fluoxetine with CBT were 71.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 62%-80%); fluoxetine alone, 60.6% (95% CI, 51%-70%); CBT alone, 43.2% (95% CI, 34%-52%); and placebo, 34.8% (95% CI, 26%-44%). On the Clinical Global Impressions improvement responder analysis, the 2 fluoxetine-containing conditions were statistically superior to CBT and to placebo. Clinically significant suicidal thinking, which was present in 29% of the sample at baseline, improved significantly in all 4 treatment groups. Fluoxetine with CBT showed the greatest reduction (P =.02). Seven (1.6%) of 439 patients attempted suicide; there were no completed suicides.

Conclusion: The combination of fluoxetine with CBT offered the most favorable tradeoff between benefit and risk for adolescents with major depressive disorder.

Citing Articles

Clinical characteristics of depressed children and adolescents with and without suicidal thoughts and behavior: a cross-sectional study.

Haberling I, Preisig M, Emery S, Baumgartner N, Albermann M, Strumberger M Front Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025; 4:1510961.

PMID: 40061518 PMC: 11885278. DOI: 10.3389/frcha.2025.1510961.


Therapeutic effects of short-term trauma stabilization techniques combined with escitalopram in treating adolescent major depressive disorder: a pilot randomised controlled trial.

Xu J, Wu J, Wang X, Chen Q, Xu R, Xu Y BMC Psychiatry. 2025; 25(1):176.

PMID: 40001018 PMC: 11863421. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-025-06624-7.


Investigating the relationship between inflammatory cytokines and adolescent depression: a comparative analysis.

Liu M, Tang J, Xu G, Chen X, Fang K, He F Front Psychiatry. 2025; 16:1524015.

PMID: 39980978 PMC: 11839723. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1524015.


Comparing apples and oranges in youth depression treatments? A quantitative critique of the evidence base and guidelines.

Stringaris A, Burman C, Delpech R, Uher R, Bhudia D, Miliou D BMJ Ment Health. 2025; 28(1.

PMID: 39832835 PMC: 11752052. DOI: 10.1136/bmjment-2024-301162.


Delta-Beta Coupling in Adolescents with Depression: A Preliminary Examination of Associations with Age, Symptoms, and Treatment Outcomes.

Venanzi L, Dickey L, Pegg S, Kujawa A J Psychophysiol. 2025; 38(2):102-115.

PMID: 39830953 PMC: 11741627. DOI: 10.1027/0269-8803/a000333.