Native Coronary Disease Progression Exceeds Failed Revascularization As Cause of Angina After Five Years in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI)
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objectives: Coronary angiograms obtained five years following revascularization were examined to assess the extent of compromise in myocardial perfusion due to failure of revascularization versus progression of native disease.
Background: The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) randomized revascularization candidates between bypass surgery and angioplasty. Entry and five-year angiograms from 407 of 519 (78%) patients at four centers were analyzed.
Methods: Analysis of the distribution of coronary vessels and stenoses provided a measure of myocardial jeopardy that correlates with presence of angina. The extent to which initial benefits of revascularization were undone by failed revascularization versus native disease progression was assessed.
Results: Myocardial jeopardy fell following initial revascularization, from 60% to 17% for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-treated patients compared with 60% to 7% for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery patients (p < 0.001), rebounding at five years to 25% for PCI and 20% for surgery patients (p = 0.01). Correspondingly, angina prevalence was higher at five years in PCI-treated patients than in surgery-treated patients (28% vs. 18%; p = 0.03). However, myocardial jeopardy at five years, and not initial treatment (PCI vs. surgery), was independently associated with late angina. Increased myocardial jeopardy from entry to five-year angiogram occurred in 42% of PCI-treated patients and 51% of CABG-treated patients (p = 0.06). Among the increases in myocardial jeopardy, two-thirds occurred in previously untreated arteries.
Conclusions: Native coronary disease progression occurred more often than failed revascularization in both PCI- and CABG-treated patients as a cause of jeopardized myocardium and angina recurrence. These results support intensive postrevascularization risk-factor modification.
Cardiac Computed Tomography in Monitoring Revascularization.
Tonet E, Amantea V, Lapolla D, Assabbi P, Boccadoro A, Berloni M J Clin Med. 2023; 12(22).
PMID: 38002715 PMC: 10672590. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12227104.
Assessment of the Graft Quality and Patency during and after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.
Masroor M, Ahmad A, Wang Y, Dong N Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(11).
PMID: 37296743 PMC: 10252819. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13111891.
Bifurcation functional significance score as predictor of mortality: a validating study.
Vassilev D, Mileva N, Collet C, Nikolov P, Sokolova K, Karamfiloff K Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):24308.
PMID: 34934122 PMC: 8692595. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-03815-6.
The risk for subsequent coronary interventions in a local Polish population.
Hiczkiewicz J, Burchardt P, Pieszko K, Budzianowski J, Hiczkiewicz D, Musielak B Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2021; 16(4):429-435.
PMID: 33598016 PMC: 7863820. DOI: 10.5114/aic.2020.101768.
Andrade L, Souza A, Peclat T, Bartholo C, Pavanelo T, Lima R Arq Bras Cardiol. 2018; 111(6):784-793.
PMID: 30517374 PMC: 6263458. DOI: 10.5935/abc.20180199.