» Articles » PMID: 15296519

Evaluation of the Suitability of Free-energy Minimization Using Nearest-neighbor Energy Parameters for RNA Secondary Structure Prediction

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biology
Date 2004 Aug 7
PMID 15296519
Citations 102
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: A detailed understanding of an RNA's correct secondary and tertiary structure is crucial to understanding its function and mechanism in the cell. Free energy minimization with energy parameters based on the nearest-neighbor model and comparative analysis are the primary methods for predicting an RNA's secondary structure from its sequence. Version 3.1 of Mfold has been available since 1999. This version contains an expanded sequence dependence of energy parameters and the ability to incorporate coaxial stacking into free energy calculations. We test Mfold 3.1 by performing the largest and most phylogenetically diverse comparison of rRNA and tRNA structures predicted by comparative analysis and Mfold, and we use the results of our tests on 16S and 23S rRNA sequences to assess the improvement between Mfold 2.3 and Mfold 3.1.

Results: The average prediction accuracy for a 16S or 23S rRNA sequence with Mfold 3.1 is 41%, while the prediction accuracies for the majority of 16S and 23S rRNA structures tested are between 20% and 60%, with some having less than 20% prediction accuracy. The average prediction accuracy was 71% for 5S rRNA and 69% for tRNA. The majority of the 5S rRNA and tRNA sequences have prediction accuracies greater than 60%. The prediction accuracy of 16S rRNA base-pairs decreases exponentially as the number of nucleotides intervening between the 5' and 3' halves of the base-pair increases.

Conclusion: Our analysis indicates that the current set of nearest-neighbor energy parameters in conjunction with the Mfold folding algorithm are unable to consistently and reliably predict an RNA's correct secondary structure. For 16S or 23S rRNA structure prediction, Mfold 3.1 offers little improvement over Mfold 2.3. However, the nearest-neighbor energy parameters do work well for shorter RNA sequences such as tRNA or 5S rRNA, or for larger rRNAs when the contact distance between the base-pairs is less than 100 nucleotides.

Citing Articles

The separation between mRNA-ends is more variable than expected.

Gerling N, Mendez J, Gomez E, Ruiz-Garcia J FEBS Open Bio. 2024; 14(12):1985-1995.

PMID: 39226224 PMC: 11609591. DOI: 10.1002/2211-5463.13877.


Discovery and Quantification of Long-Range RNA Base Pairs in Coronavirus Genomes with SEARCH-MaP and SEISMIC-RNA.

Allan M, Aruda J, Plung J, Grote S, Martin des Taillades Y, de Lajarte A Res Sq. 2024; .

PMID: 39149495 PMC: 11326378. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4814547/v1.


A Hitchhiker's guide to RNA-RNA structure and interaction prediction tools.

Tieng F, Abdullah-Zawawi M, Md Shahri N, Mohamed-Hussein Z, Lee L, Mutalib N Brief Bioinform. 2023; 25(1).

PMID: 38040490 PMC: 10753535. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbad421.


Computationally-guided design and selection of high performing ribosomal active site mutants.

Kofman C, Watkins A, Kim D, Willi J, Wooldredge A, Karim A Nucleic Acids Res. 2022; 50(22):13143-13154.

PMID: 36484094 PMC: 9825160. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac1036.


Markov Chain-Based Sampling for Exploring RNA Secondary Structure under the Nearest Neighbor Thermodynamic Model and Extended Applications.

Kirkpatrick A, Patton K, Tetali P, Mitchell C Math Comput Appl. 2022; 25(4).

PMID: 35924027 PMC: 9344895. DOI: 10.3390/mca25040067.


References
1.
Fields D, Gutell R . An analysis of large rRNA sequences folded by a thermodynamic method. Fold Des. 1996; 1(6):419-30. DOI: 10.1016/S1359-0278(96)00058-2. View

2.
Walter A, Turner D, Kim J, Lyttle M, Muller P, Mathews D . Coaxial stacking of helixes enhances binding of oligoribonucleotides and improves predictions of RNA folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994; 91(20):9218-22. PMC: 44783. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.91.20.9218. View

3.
Lee J, Cannone J, Gutell R . The lonepair triloop: a new motif in RNA structure. J Mol Biol. 2002; 325(1):65-83. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2836(02)01106-3. View

4.
Chen J, Le S, Maizel J . Prediction of common secondary structures of RNAs: a genetic algorithm approach. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000; 28(4):991-9. PMC: 102574. DOI: 10.1093/nar/28.4.991. View

5.
Woese C, Winker S, Gutell R . Architecture of ribosomal RNA: constraints on the sequence of "tetra-loops". Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990; 87(21):8467-71. PMC: 54977. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.87.21.8467. View