» Articles » PMID: 15295126

Sexual Network Analysis of a Gonorrhoea Outbreak

Overview
Date 2004 Aug 6
PMID 15295126
Citations 49
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Sexual partnerships can be viewed as networks in order to study disease transmission. We examined the transmission of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in a localised outbreak in Alberta, Canada, using measures of network centrality to determine the association between risk of infection of network members and their position within the sexual network. We also compared risk in smaller disconnected components with a large network centred on a social venue.

Methods: During the investigation of the outbreak, epidemiological data were collected on gonorrhoea cases and their sexual contacts from STI surveillance records. In addition to traditional contact tracing information, subjects were interviewed about social venues they attended in the past year where casual sexual partnering may have occurred. Sexual networks were constructed by linking together named partners. Univariate comparisons of individual network member characteristics and algebraic measures of network centrality were completed.

Results: The sexual networks consisted of 182 individuals, of whom 107 were index cases with laboratory confirmed gonorrhoea and 75 partners of index cases. People who had significantly higher information centrality within each of their local networks were found to have patronised a popular motel bar in the main town in the region (p = 0.05). When the social interaction through the bar was considered, a large network of 89 individuals was constructed that joined all eight of the largest local networks. Moreover, several networks from different communities were linked by individuals who served as bridge populations as a result of their sexual partnering.

Conclusion: Asking clients about particular social venues emphasised the importance of location in disease transmission. Network measures of centrality, particularly information centrality, allowed the identification of key individuals through whom infection could be channelled into local networks. Such individuals would be ideal targets for increased interventions.

Citing Articles

Social Network Analysis of Ebola Virus Disease During the 2014 Outbreak in Sukudu, Sierra Leone.

Hazel A, Davidson M, Rogers A, Barrie M, Freeman A, Mbayoh M Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022; 9(11):ofac593.

PMID: 36467298 PMC: 9709704. DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofac593.


Social network research hotspots and trends in public health: A bibliometric and visual analysis.

Shen B, Guan T, Ma J, Yang L, Liu Y Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2022; 2:100155.

PMID: 36101592 PMC: 9461482. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhip.2021.100155.


Socially Connected Neighborhoods and the Spread of Sexually Transmitted Infections.

Newmyer L, Evans M, Graif C Demography. 2022; 59(4):1299-1323.

PMID: 35838157 PMC: 9707946. DOI: 10.1215/00703370-10054898.


Privacy and Confidentiality Considerations for Collecting HIV Risk Network Data among Men who Have Sex with Men and Implications for Constructing Valid Risk Networks.

Rudolph A, Young A Soc Networks. 2021; 67:47-54.

PMID: 34712004 PMC: 8547314. DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2019.09.002.


Network centrality for the identification of biomarkers in respondent-driven sampling datasets.

Grubb J, Lopez D, Mohan B, Matta J PLoS One. 2021; 16(8):e0256601.

PMID: 34428228 PMC: 8384166. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256601.


References
1.
Ghani A, Ison C, Ward H, Garnett G, Bell G, Kinghorn G . Sexual partner networks in the transmission of sexually transmitted diseases. An analysis of gonorrhea cases in Sheffield, UK. Sex Transm Dis. 1996; 23(6):498-503. DOI: 10.1097/00007435-199611000-00011. View

2.
Rothenberg R, Sterk C, Toomey K, Potterat J, Johnson D, Schrader M . Using social network and ethnographic tools to evaluate syphilis transmission. Sex Transm Dis. 1998; 25(3):154-60. DOI: 10.1097/00007435-199803000-00009. View

3.
Rothenberg R, Potterat J, Woodhouse D, Muth S, Darrow W, Klovdahl A . Social network dynamics and HIV transmission. AIDS. 1998; 12(12):1529-36. DOI: 10.1097/00002030-199812000-00016. View

4.
Day S, Ward H, Ison C, Bell G, Weber J . Sexual networks: the integration of social and genetic data. Soc Sci Med. 1999; 47(12):1981-92. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00306-2. View

5.
Yorke J, Hethcote H, Nold A . Dynamics and control of the transmission of gonorrhea. Sex Transm Dis. 1978; 5(2):51-6. DOI: 10.1097/00007435-197804000-00003. View