» Articles » PMID: 15293636

Enhancing the Effects of Extinction on Attention-maintained Behavior Through Noncontingent Delivery of Attention or Stimuli Identified Via a Competing Stimulus Assessment

Overview
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2004 Aug 6
PMID 15293636
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unlabelled: Recent research has shown that the noncontingent delivery of competing stimuli can effectively reduce rates of destructive behavior maintained by social-positive reinforcement, even when the contingency for destructive behavior remains intact. It may be useful, therefore, to have a systematic means for predicting which reinforcers do and do not compete successfully with the reinforcer that is maintaining destructive behavior. In the present study, we conducted a brief competing stimulus assessment in which noncontingent access to a variety of tangible stimuli (one toy per trial) was superimposed on a fixed-ratio 1 schedule of attention for destructive behavior for individuals whose behavior was found to be reinforced by attention during a functional analysis. Tangible stimuli that resulted in the lowest rates of destructive behavior and highest percentages of engagement during the competing stimulus assessment were subsequently used in a noncontingent tangible items plus extinction treatment package and were compared to noncontingent attention plus extinction and extinction alone. Results indicated that both treatments resulted in greater reductions in the target behavior than did extinction alone and suggested that the competing stimulus assessment may be helpful in predicting stimuli that can enhance the effects of extinction when noncontingent attention is unavailable.

Descriptors: Attention-maintained problem behavior, competing stimuli, extinction, functional analysis, noncontingent reinforcement

Citing Articles

Toward Maximizing Assessment Efficiency: A Synthesized Trial-Based Functional Analysis and Competing Stimulus Assessment.

Shawler L, Castaneda-Velazquez G, Lafo G Behav Sci (Basel). 2024; 14(5).

PMID: 38785863 PMC: 11118102. DOI: 10.3390/bs14050372.


Advancing Methods in Animal-Assisted Intervention: Demonstration of Starting Points in Clinical Practice for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Clay C, Schmitz B, Hogg A, Keicher E, Clohisy A, Kahng S Behav Anal Pract. 2023; 16(1):145-155.

PMID: 37006431 PMC: 10050646. DOI: 10.1007/s40617-022-00704-w.


Efficacy of competing stimulus assessments: A summary of 35 consecutively encountered cases.

Laureano B, Fernandez N, P Hagopian L J Appl Behav Anal. 2023; 56(2):428-441.

PMID: 36855029 PMC: 10329484. DOI: 10.1002/jaba.979.


Assessment and Treatment of a Foot Fetish Exhibited by an Adolescent With Autism.

Hodges A, Wilder D, Ertel H Behav Anal Pract. 2020; 13(4):961-965.

PMID: 33269206 PMC: 7666233. DOI: 10.1007/s40617-020-00468-1.


Competing stimulus assessments: A systematic review.

Haddock J, P Hagopian L J Appl Behav Anal. 2020; 53(4):1982-2001.

PMID: 32720719 PMC: 8151254. DOI: 10.1002/jaba.754.


References
1.
Vollmer T, Iwata B, Zarcone J, Smith R, Mazaleski J . The role of attention in the treatment of attention-maintained self-injurious behavior: noncontingent reinforcement and differential reinforcement of other behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1993; 26(1):9-21. PMC: 1297716. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1993.26-9. View

2.
Lalli J, Casey S, Kates K . Noncontingent reinforcement as treatment for severe problem behavior: some procedural variations. J Appl Behav Anal. 1997; 30(1):127-36; quiz 136-7. PMC: 1284026. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-127. View

3.
DeLeon I, Iwata B . Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. J Appl Behav Anal. 1996; 29(4):519-32; quiz 532-3. PMC: 1284008. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-519. View

4.
Laport G, Levine B, Stadtmauer E, Schuster S, Luger S, Grupp S . Adoptive transfer of costimulated T cells induces lymphocytosis in patients with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma following CD34+-selected hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood. 2003; 102(6):2004-13. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2003-01-0095. View

5.
Piazza C, Roane H, Keeney K, Boney B, Abt K . Varying response effort in the treatment of pica maintained by automatic reinforcement. J Appl Behav Anal. 2002; 35(3):233-46. PMC: 1284382. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2002.35-233. View