Gastrointestinal Examinations with Digital Radiography
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Basic imaging properties and clinical usefulness of an upgraded digital radiography system were evaluated. The system, which has 1,024 x 1,024 and 2,048 x 2,048 matrices, was upgraded with smaller focal spots (0.3 and 0.8 mm) and reduced thickness of the photoconductive layer of the video camera. Screen-film and digital images (with and without postprocessing) of the upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract were used in the clinical evaluation. Overall modulation transfer functions of the upgraded digital system were comparable to those of the screen-film system, especially at the lower spatial frequency. Threshold contrasts of the two systems were similar despite a 50% reduction in incident exposure for the digital system. For the upper GI tract, digital images processed with unsharp masking techniques were comparable in quality to screen-film images before and after upgrade of the system. For the lower GI tract, screen-film images were better than digital images, except for those produced with a 2,048 x 2,048 matrix with unsharp masking. Further evaluation of the system for examination of other parts of the body seems warranted.
Ohata H, Oka M, Yanaoka K, Shimizu Y, Mukoubayashi C, Mugitani K Cancer Sci. 2005; 96(10):713-20.
PMID: 16232204 PMC: 11158591. DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2005.00098.x.
Reassessment of barium radiographic examination in diagnosing gastrointestinal diseases.
World J Gastroenterol. 2002; 5(5):383-387.
PMID: 11819473 PMC: 4688605. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v5.i5.383.
Okada Y, Kusano S, Endo T J Digit Imaging. 1994; 7(3):154-9.
PMID: 7948175 DOI: 10.1007/BF03168509.
Sugino Y, Imai Y, Fujisawa H, Hiramatsu K, Amoh H, Kumakura K J Digit Imaging. 1995; 8(1 Suppl 1):84-8.
PMID: 7734548 DOI: 10.1007/BF03168074.
Baba Y, Takahashi M, Tsuchigami T, Higashida Y J Digit Imaging. 1995; 8(1 Suppl 1):80-3.
PMID: 7734547 DOI: 10.1007/BF03168073.