» Articles » PMID: 15280239

The Quantitative Genetic Basis of Male Mating Behavior in Drosophila Melanogaster

Overview
Journal Genetics
Specialty Genetics
Date 2004 Jul 29
PMID 15280239
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Male mating behavior is an important component of fitness in Drosophila and displays segregating variation in natural populations. However, we know very little about the genes affecting naturally occurring variation in mating behavior, their effects, or their interactions. Here, we have mapped quantitative trait loci (QTL) affecting courtship occurrence, courtship latency, copulation occurrence, and copulation latency that segregate between a D. melanogaster strain selected for reduced male mating propensity (2b) and a standard wild-type strain (Oregon-R). Mating behavior was assessed in a population of 98 recombinant inbred lines derived from these two strains and QTL affecting mating behavior were mapped using composite interval mapping. We found four QTL affecting male mating behavior at cytological locations 1A;3E, 57C;57F, 72A;85F, and 96F;99A. We used deficiency complementation mapping to map the autosomal QTL with much higher resolution to five QTL at 56F5;56F8, 56F9;57A3, 70E1;71F4, 78C5;79A1, and 96F1;97B1. Quantitative complementation tests performed for 45 positional candidate genes within these intervals revealed 7 genes that failed to complement the QTL: eagle, 18 wheeler, Enhancer of split, Polycomb, spermatocyte arrest, l(2)05510, and l(2)k02206. None of these genes have been previously implicated in mating behavior, demonstrating that quantitative analysis of subtle variants can reveal novel pleiotropic effects of key developmental loci on behavior.

Citing Articles

Courtship song differs between African and European populations of and involves a strong effect locus.

Lollar M, Kim E, Stern D, Pool J bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38798463 PMC: 11118343. DOI: 10.1101/2024.05.14.594231.


Predicting thresholds for population replacement gene drives.

Janzen A, Pothula R, Sychla A, Feltman N, Smanski M BMC Biol. 2024; 22(1):40.

PMID: 38369493 PMC: 10875781. DOI: 10.1186/s12915-024-01823-2.


The complex genetic architecture of male mate choice evolution between Drosophila species.

Shahandeh M, Turner T Heredity (Edinb). 2020; 124(6):737-750.

PMID: 32203250 PMC: 7239879. DOI: 10.1038/s41437-020-0309-9.


The Loci of Behavioral Evolution: Evidence That Fas2 and tilB Underlie Differences in Pupation Site Choice Behavior between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.

Pischedda A, Shahandeh M, Turner T Mol Biol Evol. 2019; 37(3):864-880.

PMID: 31774527 PMC: 7038752. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msz274.


The Genetics of Male Pheromone Preference Difference Between and .

Shahandeh M, Pischedda A, Rodriguez J, Turner T G3 (Bethesda). 2019; 10(1):401-415.

PMID: 31748379 PMC: 6945012. DOI: 10.1534/g3.119.400780.


References
1.
WILLIAMS M, Rodriguez A, Kimbrell D, Eldon E . The 18-wheeler mutation reveals complex antibacterial gene regulation in Drosophila host defense. EMBO J. 1997; 16(20):6120-30. PMC: 1326296. DOI: 10.1093/emboj/16.20.6120. View

2.
Glazier A, Nadeau J, Aitman T . Finding genes that underlie complex traits. Science. 2002; 298(5602):2345-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.1076641. View

3.
Spradling A, Stern D, Beaton A, Rhem E, Laverty T, Mozden N . The Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project gene disruption project: Single P-element insertions mutating 25% of vital Drosophila genes. Genetics. 1999; 153(1):135-77. PMC: 1460730. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/153.1.135. View

4.
Nuzhdin S, Pasyukova E, Dilda C, Zeng Z, Mackay T . Sex-specific quantitative trait loci affecting longevity in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997; 94(18):9734-9. PMC: 23259. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.94.18.9734. View

5.
Civetta A, Cantor E . The genetics of mating recognition between Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia. Genet Res. 2004; 82(2):117-26. DOI: 10.1017/s0016672303006360. View