» Articles » PMID: 15275841

Are in Vivo and in Situ Brain Tissues Mechanically Similar?

Overview
Journal J Biomech
Specialty Physiology
Date 2004 Jul 28
PMID 15275841
Citations 102
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Brain tissue mechanical properties have been well-characterized in vitro, and were found to be inhomogeneous, nonlinear anisotropic and influenced by neurological development and postmortem time interval prior to testing. However, brain in vivo is a vascularized tissue, and there is a paucity of information regarding the effect of perfusion on brain mechanical properties. Furthermore, mechanical properties are often extracted from preconditioned tissue, and it remains unclear if these properties are representative of non-preconditioned tissue. We present non-preconditioned (NPC) and preconditioned (PC) relaxation responses of porcine brain (N = 10) obtained in vivo, in situ and in vitro, at anterior, mid and posterior regions of the cerebral cortex during 4mm indentations at either 3 or 1 mm/s. Material property characteristics showed no dependency on the site tested, thus revealing that cortical gray matter on the parietal and frontal lobes can be considered homogenous. In most cases, preconditioning decreased the shear moduli, with a more pronounced effect in the dead (in situ and in vitro) brain. For most conditions, it was found that only the long-term time constant of relaxation (tau > 20 s) significantly decreased from in vivo to in situ modes (p < 0.02), and perfusion had no effect on any other property. These findings support the concept that perfusion does not affect the stiffness of living cortical tissue.

Citing Articles

Applications of hydrogels and nanoparticles in the treatment of traumatic brain injury.

Shi J, Tang J, Xu J, Jiang N, Yang Y, Chen H Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025; 12():1515164.

PMID: 39834632 PMC: 11743581. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1515164.


Toward understanding the brain tissue behavior due to preconditioning: an experimental study and RVE approach.

Mazhari A, Shafieian M Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1462148.

PMID: 39439552 PMC: 11493751. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1462148.


Cross-linking manipulation of waterborne biodegradable polyurethane for constructing mechanically adaptable tissue engineering scaffolds.

Sheng N, Lin W, Lin J, Feng Y, Wang Y, He X Regen Biomater. 2024; 11:rbae111.

PMID: 39323747 PMC: 11422185. DOI: 10.1093/rb/rbae111.


Post-mortem changes of anisotropic mechanical properties in the porcine brain assessed by MR elastography.

Wang S, Eckstein K, Guertler C, Johnson C, Okamoto R, McGarry M Brain Multiphys. 2024; 6.

PMID: 38933498 PMC: 11207183. DOI: 10.1016/j.brain.2024.100091.


Neurogenic Cell Behavior in 3D Culture Enhanced Within a Highly Compliant Synthetic Hydrogel Platform Formed via Competitive Crosslinking.

Chapla R, Katz R, West J Cell Mol Bioeng. 2024; 17(1):35-48.

PMID: 38435792 PMC: 10901766. DOI: 10.1007/s12195-024-00794-2.