» Articles » PMID: 15272049

Demonstration of a Second Rapidly Conducting Cortico-diaphragmatic Pathway in Humans

Overview
Journal J Physiol
Specialty Physiology
Date 2004 Jul 24
PMID 15272049
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Functional imaging studies in normal humans have shown that the supplementary motor area (SMA) and the primary motor cortex (PMC) are coactivated during various breathing tasks. It is not known whether a direct pathway from the SMA to the diaphragm exists, and if so what properties it has. Using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) a site at the vertex, representing the diaphragm primary motor cortex, has been identified. TMS mapping revealed a second area 3 cm anterior to the vertex overlying the SMA, which had a rapidly conducting pathway to the diaphragm (mean latency 16.7 +/- 2.4 ms). In comparison to the vertex, the anterior position was characterized by a higher diaphragm motor threshold, a greater proportional increase in motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude with voluntary facilitation and a shorter silent period. Stimulus-response curves did not differ significantly between the vertex and anterior positions. Using paired TMS, we also compared intracortical inhibition/facilitation (ICI/ICF) curves. In comparison to the vertex, the MEP elicited from the anterior position was not inhibited at short interstimulus intervals (1-5 ms) and was more facilitated at long interstimulus intervals (9-20 ms). The patterns of response were identical for the costal and crural diaphragms. We conclude that the two coil positions represent discrete areas that are likely to be the PMC and SMA, with the latter wielding a more excitatory effect on the diaphragm.

Citing Articles

Beyond the Lungs: Extrapulmonary Effects of Non-Invasive and Invasive Ventilation Strategies.

Silva P, Chiumello D, Pozzi T, Rocco P J Clin Med. 2025; 14(4).

PMID: 40004773 PMC: 11856178. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14041242.


Influence of bilateral transcranial direct-current stimulation on muscle strength and respiratory endurance: Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial protocol.

Pereira E, Areas F, Kuster E, Maia M, da Silva J, Norbim L MethodsX. 2024; 13:102939.

PMID: 39398535 PMC: 11470191. DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2024.102939.


Changes in respiratory structure and function after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: observations from spinal cord and brain.

Xie Y, Zhang L, Guo S, Peng R, Gong H, Yang M Front Neurol. 2023; 14:1251833.

PMID: 37869136 PMC: 10587692. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1251833.


Why do different motor cortical areas activate the same muscles?.

Albishi A Brain Struct Funct. 2023; 228(9):2017-2024.

PMID: 37709903 DOI: 10.1007/s00429-023-02703-1.


Forebrain control of breathing: Anatomy and potential functions.

Schottelkotte K, Crone S Front Neurol. 2022; 13:1041887.

PMID: 36388186 PMC: 9663927. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1041887.


References
1.
Ridding M, Sheean G, Rothwell J, Inzelberg R, Kujirai T . Changes in the balance between motor cortical excitation and inhibition in focal, task specific dystonia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1995; 59(5):493-8. PMC: 1073711. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.59.5.493. View

2.
Picard N, Strick P . Imaging the premotor areas. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2001; 11(6):663-72. DOI: 10.1016/s0959-4388(01)00266-5. View

3.
Civardi C, Cantello R, Asselman P, Rothwell J . Transcranial magnetic stimulation can be used to test connections to primary motor areas from frontal and medial cortex in humans. Neuroimage. 2001; 14(6):1444-53. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0918. View

4.
Siebner H, Rothwell J . Transcranial magnetic stimulation: new insights into representational cortical plasticity. Exp Brain Res. 2002; 148(1):1-16. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-002-1234-2. View

5.
Aminoff M, Sears T . Spinal integration of segmental, cortical and breathing inputs to thoracic respiratory motoneurones. J Physiol. 1971; 215(2):557-75. PMC: 1331899. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009485. View