» Articles » PMID: 15256507

Incongruent Patterns of Local and Global Genome Size Evolution in Cotton

Overview
Journal Genome Res
Specialty Genetics
Date 2004 Jul 17
PMID 15256507
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Genome sizes in plants vary over several orders of magnitude, reflecting a combination of differentially acting local and global forces such as biases in indel accumulation and transposable element proliferation or removal. To gain insight into the relative role of these and other forces, approximately 105 kb of contiguous sequence surrounding the cellulose synthase gene CesA1 was compared for the two coresident genomes (AT and DT) of the allopolyploid cotton species, Gossypium hirsutum. These two genomes differ approximately twofold in size, having diverged from a common ancestor approximately 5-10 million years ago (Mya) and been reunited in the same nucleus at the time of polyploid formation, approximately 1-2 Mya. Gene content, order, and spacing are largely conserved between the two genomes, although a few transposable elements and a single cpDNA fragment distinguish the two homoeologs. Sequence conservation is high in both intergenic and genic regions, with 14 conserved genes detected in both genomes yielding a density of 1 gene every 7.5 kb. In contrast to the twofold overall difference in DNA content, no disparity in size was observed for this 105-kb region, and 555 indels were detected that distinguish the two homoeologous BACs, approximately equally distributed between AT and DT in number and aggregate size. The data demonstrate that genome size evolution at this phylogenetic scale is not primarily caused by mechanisms that operate uniformly across different genomic regions and components; instead, the twofold overall difference in DNA content must reflect locally operating forces between gene islands or in largely gene-free regions.

Citing Articles

Identification of a genome-specific repetitive element in the D genome.

Lu H, Cui X, Zhao Y, Magwanga R, Li P, Cai X PeerJ. 2020; 8:e8344.

PMID: 31915591 PMC: 6944119. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8344.


Gossypium barbadense and Gossypium hirsutum genomes provide insights into the origin and evolution of allotetraploid cotton.

Hu Y, Chen J, Fang L, Zhang Z, Ma W, Niu Y Nat Genet. 2019; 51(4):739-748.

PMID: 30886425 DOI: 10.1038/s41588-019-0371-5.


Discovery and annotation of a novel transposable element family in Gossypium.

Lu H, Cui X, Liu Z, Liu Y, Wang X, Zhou Z BMC Plant Biol. 2018; 18(1):307.

PMID: 30486783 PMC: 6264596. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-018-1519-7.


Comparative Genomics of an Unusual Biogeographic Disjunction in the Cotton Tribe (Gossypieae) Yields Insights into Genome Downsizing.

Grover C, Arick 2nd M, Conover J, Thrash A, Hu G, Sanders W Genome Biol Evol. 2017; 9(12):3328-3344.

PMID: 29194487 PMC: 5737505. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evx248.


Cytogenetic maps of homoeologous chromosomes A 01 and D 01 and their integration with the genome assembly in .

Liu Y, Liu Z, Peng R, Wang Y, Zhou Z, Cai X Comp Cytogenet. 2017; 11(2):405-420.

PMID: 28919972 PMC: 5596994. DOI: 10.3897/CompCytogen.v11i2.12824.


References
1.
Feschotte C, Mouches C . Evidence that a family of miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements (MITEs) from the Arabidopsis thaliana genome has arisen from a pogo-like DNA transposon. Mol Biol Evol. 2000; 17(5):730-7. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026351. View

2.
Wendel J . Genome evolution in polyploids. Plant Mol Biol. 2000; 42(1):225-49. View

3.
Small R, Ryburn J, Cronn R, Seelanan T, Wendel J . The tortoise and the hare: choosing between noncoding plastome and nuclear Adh sequences for phylogeny reconstruction in a recently diverged plant group. Am J Bot. 2011; 85(9):1301-15. View

4.
Senchina D, Alvarez I, Cronn R, Liu B, Rong J, Noyes R . Rate variation among nuclear genes and the age of polyploidy in Gossypium. Mol Biol Evol. 2003; 20(4):633-43. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msg065. View

5.
Petrov D . Mutational equilibrium model of genome size evolution. Theor Popul Biol. 2002; 61(4):531-44. DOI: 10.1006/tpbi.2002.1605. View