» Articles » PMID: 15255042

Multiple Causes of Sexual Segregation in European Red Deer: Enlightenments from Varying Breeding Phenology at High and Low Latitude

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2004 Jul 17
PMID 15255042
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Sexual segregation outside the mating season occurs in most species of sexually dimorphic ungulates and has been extensively described in the literature, but the mechanisms causing segregation are still debated. The detailed pattern of sexual segregation throughout the year has rarely been presented for mammals, and no study, to our knowledge, has used latitudinal-related variation in breeding phenology to shed light on the underlying mechanisms. Recent methodological developments have made it possible to quantify separate components of segregation (social, habitat) and activity synchrony in animal groups, but these major improvements have so far been little used. We observed European red deer year round at two widely different latitudes (France and Norway) and tested three different mechanistic hypotheses of segregation related to: (i) predation risk; (ii) body-size-related forage selection; and (iii) activity budget. Habitat segregation peaked during calving in both populations and dropped rapidly after calving. Females with calves were more segregated from males than were females without calves, pointing to a key role of antipredator behaviour even though large predators are absent in France and extremely rare in Norway. However, at both sites individuals also grouped with their own sex within habitat types (i.e. social segregation), and individuals in mixed-sex groups were less synchronized in activity type than individuals in either unisex male or unisex female groups, suggesting that differences in activity budgets are involved. Social segregation peaked during calving and was lowest during the rut (indicating aggregation) in both populations; these activities occurred one month later in the Northern populations, corresponding well with known differences in breeding phenology. We conclude that latitude-dependent breeding phenology shapes the seasonal pattern of sexual segregation and that sexual segregation in ungulates has multiple causes.

Citing Articles

Remote sensing reveals the role of forage quality and quantity for summer habitat use in red deer.

Rempfler T, Rossi C, Schweizer J, Peters W, Signer C, Filli F Mov Ecol. 2024; 12(1):80.

PMID: 39696538 PMC: 11654361. DOI: 10.1186/s40462-024-00521-6.


Divergent foraging strategies between populations of sympatric matrilineal killer whales.

Tennessen J, Holt M, Wright B, Hanson M, Emmons C, Giles D Behav Ecol. 2023; 34(3):373-386.

PMID: 37192928 PMC: 10183210. DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arad002.


Spatial variation in red deer density in a transboundary forest ecosystem.

Tourani M, Franke F, Heurich M, Henrich M, Peterka T, Ebert C Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):4561.

PMID: 36941335 PMC: 10027870. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-31283-7.


Displacement Effects of Conservation Grazing on Red Deer (Cervus elaphus) Spatial Behaviour.

Weiss F, Michler F, Gillich B, Tillmann J, Ciuti S, Heurich M Environ Manage. 2022; 70(5):763-779.

PMID: 35994055 PMC: 9519651. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-022-01697-6.


Behavioural synchronization in a multilevel society of feral horses.

Maeda T, Sueur C, Hirata S, Yamamoto S PLoS One. 2021; 16(10):e0258944.

PMID: 34699556 PMC: 8547633. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258944.


References
1.
Clutton-Brock T . Mammalian mating systems. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1989; 236(1285):339-72. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1989.0027. View

2.
Ruckstuhl K, Neuhaus P . Sexual segregation in ungulates: a comparative test of three hypotheses. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2002; 77(1):77-96. DOI: 10.1017/s1464793101005814. View

3.
Emlen S, Oring L . Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science. 1977; 197(4300):215-23. DOI: 10.1126/science.327542. View

4.
Wilmshurst J, Fryxell J, Bergman C . The allometry of patch selection in ruminants. Proc Biol Sci. 2000; 267(1441):345-9. PMC: 1690547. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1007. View

5.
Conradt L . Could asynchrony in activity between the sexes cause intersexual social segregation in ruminants?. Proc Biol Sci. 1998; 265(1403):1359-63. PMC: 1689206. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0442. View