» Articles » PMID: 15249996

Towards Worldwide Standardisation of HbA1c Determination

Overview
Journal Diabetologia
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2004 Jul 14
PMID 15249996
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Haemoglobin A(1)c (HbA(1)c) or glycohaemoglobin is one of the most important parameters in the management of patients with diabetes mellitus, but to date there is no international standard for determining HbA(1)c. Most of the routine HbA(1)c assays are standardised against one of the local standardisation schemes like the NGSP (USA) and other schemes (Japan, Sweden). Still, results of HbA(1)c tests diverge considerably, as do the accompanying clinical decision limits. The IFCC Working Group on HbA(1)c Standardisation has developed a reference method and also set up a reference system for HbA(1)c, in which the analyte is defined as beta-N-glycated haemoglobin. This reference system consists of a network of reference laboratories that uses the reference methods and certified reference materials for optimal measurement of HbA(1)c in human blood. The main task of the network is to assign values to secondary reference materials, to be used by manufacturers of routine HbA(1)c assays to calibrate their assays. The high specificity of the reference method results in lower HbA(1)c values in blood samples, since the unspecific components falsely identified as HbA(1)c in routine methods are not measured by the reference method. The reference range for the new reference method was determined as 3 to 4% and the clinical decision limits were translated from existing guidelines: goal of treatment 5% HbA(1)c, change of therapy advised at HbA(1)c greater than 6%. Despite these lower values, worldwide implementation of the IFCC reference system for HbA(1)c is recommended, in order to end the great divergence in HbA(1)c results, with which physicians and patients are confronted today.

Citing Articles

Clinical Risk Assessment and Comparison of Bias between Laboratory Methods for Estimation of HbA1c for Glycated Hemoglobin in Hyperglycemic Patients.

Mukherjee S, Yadav P, Ray S, Jadhav A, Wakode S Curr Diabetes Rev. 2023; 20(7):e261023222764.

PMID: 37921160 DOI: 10.2174/0115733998257140231011102518.


Clinical and genetic characteristics of CEL-MODY (MODY8): a literature review and screening in Chinese individuals diagnosed with early-onset type 2 diabetes.

Sun S, Gong S, Li M, Wang X, Wang F, Cai X Endocrine. 2023; 83(1):99-109.

PMID: 37726640 DOI: 10.1007/s12020-023-03512-6.


Two Glucose-Lowering Mechanisms of Canagliflozin Depending on Body Weight Changes in Drug-Naïve Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes.

Kutoh E, Wada A, Murayama T, Hayashi J Drugs R D. 2018; 18(4):309-315.

PMID: 30324549 PMC: 6277318. DOI: 10.1007/s40268-018-0250-z.


Characterization of Metabolic Parameters in Responders and Nonresponders Treated with Canagliflozin Monotherapy in Drug-naive Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes.

Kutoh E, Wada A, Murayama T, Hayashi J Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2018; 22(2):185-190.

PMID: 29911028 PMC: 5972471. DOI: 10.4103/ijem.IJEM_578_17.


Canagliflozin as an Initial Therapy in Drug-Naïve Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Potential Involvement of Atherogenic Lipids in its Glycemic Efficacy.

Kutoh E, Wada A, Murayama T, Takizawa Y Drugs R D. 2017; 17(2):313-320.

PMID: 28285448 PMC: 5427050. DOI: 10.1007/s40268-017-0179-7.


References
1.
John W, Gray M, Bates D, Beacham J . Enzyme immunoassay--a new technique for estimating hemoglobin A1c. Clin Chem. 1993; 39(4):663-6. View

2.
Kobold U, JEPPSSON J, Dulffer T, Finke A, Hoelzel W, Miedema K . Candidate reference methods for hemoglobin A1c based on peptide mapping. Clin Chem. 1997; 43(10):1944-51. View

3.
LITTLE R, Goldstein D . Endocrine (standardization of glycohemoglobin measurement). Anal Chem. 1995; 67(12):393R-397R. DOI: 10.1021/ac00108a020. View

4.
Hoelzel W, Miedema K . Development of a reference system for the international standardization of HbA1c/glycohemoglobin determinations. J Int Fed Clin Chem. 1996; 8(2):62-4, 66-7. View

5.
. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet. 1998; 352(9131):837-53. View