A Comparison of Single-channel Linear Amplification and Two-channel Wide-dynamic-range-compression Amplification by Means of an Independent-group Design
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
The present study used an independent-group design to compare the benefits provided by binaural, single-channel, linear, full-shell in-the-ear hearing aids and binaural, 2-channel, wide-dynamic-range-compression in-the-canal hearing aids in groups of older hearing aid wearers. Hearing aid outcome measures were obtained at both 1-month (n = 53) and 6-month (n = 34) postfit intervals with each device. Outcome measures included multiple measures of speech-recognition performance and self-report measures of hearing aid benefit, satisfaction, and usage. Aided sound-quality measurements were also obtained. Although both devices provided significant benefits to the wearers, there were no significant differences in the benefits provided by either device at the 1-month or 6-month postfit intervals.
Longitudinal Tracking of Sound Exposure and Hearing Aid Usage through Objective Data Logs.
Doyle J, Raghunathan R, Cellum I, Li G, Golub J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018; 159(1):110-116.
PMID: 29587086 PMC: 7415337. DOI: 10.1177/0194599818766056.
Shetty H, Kooknoor V Noise Health. 2017; 19(89):174-182.
PMID: 28816204 PMC: 5594922. DOI: 10.4103/nah.NAH_10_16.
Perez E, Edmonds B PLoS One. 2012; 7(3):e31831.
PMID: 22479312 PMC: 3313982. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031831.
Humes L, Burk M, Strauser L, Kinney D Ear Hear. 2009; 30(5):613-27.
PMID: 19633564 PMC: 3210026. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181b00d90.
Perception of temporally processed speech by listeners with hearing impairment.
Calandruccio L, Doherty K, Carney L, Kikkeri H Ear Hear. 2007; 28(4):512-23.
PMID: 17609613 PMC: 2572868. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31806dc1fe.