» Articles » PMID: 15243735

A Double-blind Randomized Study Comparing Imipramine with Fluvoxamine in Depressed Inpatients

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2004 Jul 10
PMID 15243735
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy of imipramine and fluvoxamine in inpatients from two centers suffering from a depressive disorder according to DSM IV criteria.

Methods: The study included 141 patients with a depressive disorder according to DSM IV criteria. After a drug-free and placebo run-in period of 1 week, patients were randomized to imipramine or fluvoxamine; doses of both drugs were adjusted to a predefined target blood level. Efficacy was evaluated 4 weeks after attaining predefined adequate plasma level.

Results: The mean age of the study group (47 males, 94 females) was 51.8 (range 19-65) years. Of these 141 patients, 56 had episode duration longer than 1 year, 48 had mood congruent psychotic features, and 138 patients received medication. Seven patients did not complete the medication trial. The total number of patients using concurrent medication was 12/138 (8.6%). On the primary outcome criteria patients on imipramine improved significantly better on the change of illness severity score of the CGI (chi2 exact trend test=4.089, df=1, P=-0.048). There was no significant difference in 50% or more reduction on the HRSD, the other primary outcome criterion. On the secondary outcome criteria the mean reduction of the HRSD scores was significantly larger in the imipramine group than in the fluvoxamine group (mean difference=3.1, standard error (SE)=1.4, t=2.15, df=136, P=0.033). There was no significant difference in the number of patients with an HRSD < or =7 at the final evaluation.

Conclusions: In depressed inpatients imipramine is more efficacious than fluvoxamine. Both drugs were well tolerated by all patients.

Citing Articles

Pharmacological treatment for psychotic depression.

Kruizinga J, Liemburg E, Burger H, Cipriani A, Geddes J, Robertson L Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021; 12:CD004044.

PMID: 34875106 PMC: 8651069. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004044.pub5.


Early improvement as a predictor of eventual antidepressant treatment response in severely depressed inpatients.

Vermeiden M, Kamperman A, Vulink M, Van den Broek W, Birkenhager T Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2014; 232(8):1347-56.

PMID: 25338776 DOI: 10.1007/s00213-014-3765-1.


Fluvoxamine versus other anti-depressive agents for depression.

Omori I, Watanabe N, Nakagawa A, Cipriani A, Barbui C, McGuire H Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; (3):CD006114.

PMID: 20238342 PMC: 4171125. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006114.pub2.


Imipramine dose in relation to therapeutic plasma level: are clinical trials using imipramine as a positive control flawed?.

Birkenhager T, Van den Broek W, Moleman P, Vulto A, Bruijn J Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005; 181(3):595-9.

PMID: 16133127 DOI: 10.1007/s00213-005-0098-0.

References
1.
Bruijn J, Moleman P, Mulder P, Van Den Broek W, van Hulst A, van der Mast R . A double-blind, fixed blood-level study comparing mirtazapine with imipramine in depressed in-patients. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1996; 127(3):231-7. View

2.
Lydiard R, Laird L, MORTON Jr W, Steele T, Kellner C, Laraia M . Fluvoxamine, imipramine, and placebo in the treatment of depressed outpatients: effects on depression. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1989; 25(1):68-70. View

3.
Niklson I, Reimitz P, Sennef C . Factors that influence the outcome of placebo-controlled antidepressant clinical trials. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1997; 33(1):41-51. View

4.
March J, Kobak K, Jefferson J, Mazza J, Greist J . A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of fluvoxamine versus imipramine in outpatients with major depression. J Clin Psychiatry. 1990; 51(5):200-2. View

5.
Anderson I . Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors versus tricyclic antidepressants: a meta-analysis of efficacy and tolerability. J Affect Disord. 2000; 58(1):19-36. DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0327(99)00092-0. View