» Articles » PMID: 15238979

Psychological Problems of Cancer Patients: a Cancer Distress Screening with a Cancer-specific Questionnaire

Overview
Journal Br J Cancer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2004 Jul 9
PMID 15238979
Citations 82
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the psychological distress of cancer patients in a disease-specific manner as well as the demographic and medical variables that have an impact on the distress. Psychological distress was assessed with the Questionnaire on Stress in Cancer Patients revised version, which has been developed and psychometrically evaluated in Germany. It consists of items about 23 cancer-specific stress situations, which have to be answered in terms of relevance and amount of distress. A heterogeneous sample of 1721 cancer in- and outpatients was assessed. For the total group, the most important distress is the fear of disease progression. We consider between 23.4% (ca. of the upper gastrointestinal tract) and 40.9% (breast cancer patients) as highly distressed. The most distressed diagnostic subgroups are patients with soft tissue tumours and breast cancer patients. There are no global (general) stress factors, as the relevant demographic and medical 'risk factors' varied between the diagnostic subgroups. Cancer-specific distress questionnaires give a more precise insight into patients' experience than general or psychiatric questionnaires. They are not only used in large screening studies but also in routine medicine, particularly when the objective is to identify patients to whom psycho-oncological support is to be given.

Citing Articles

Psycho-oncological burden in patients with brain metastases undergoing neurological surgery.

Araceli T, Fischl A, Haj A, Doenitz C, Stoerr E, Hillberg A Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1463467.

PMID: 39669367 PMC: 11634795. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1463467.


Medical and Psychological Intervention for Indian Adult Patients with Cancer: A Randomised Control Study.

Barre V, G P, Rana S, Saxena R, Satapathy S Ann Neurosci. 2024; :09727531241244781.

PMID: 39544665 PMC: 11559967. DOI: 10.1177/09727531241244781.


Effectiveness of Training the Couples on the Anxiety of Patients with Breast Cancer and Their Spouses: A Quasi-Experimental Study.

Banaee B, Kiani F, Sanchooli A, Sarabandi A Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024; 25(9):3007-3013.

PMID: 39342577 PMC: 11700317. DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.9.3007.


Systematic development of a patient-reported ONCOlogical-ROUTinE-Screening (ONCO-ROUTES) procedure at the University Cancer Center Regensburg.

Maurer J, Saibold A, Gerl K, Koller M, Koelbl O, Pukrop T J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024; 150(9):435.

PMID: 39340547 PMC: 11438834. DOI: 10.1007/s00432-024-05955-4.


'Just because I have prostate cancer doesn't mean that I can't do things' - men's experiences of the acceptability of an exercise intervention for prostate cancer during treatment.

Murphy K, Kehoe B, Denieffe S, McGrath A, Hacking D, Fairman C BMC Cancer. 2024; 24(1):949.

PMID: 39095735 PMC: 11297682. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12687-8.


References
1.
Carlson L, Bultz B . Cancer distress screening. Needs, models, and methods. J Psychosom Res. 2003; 55(5):403-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3999(03)00514-2. View

2.
Bergner M, Bobbitt R, Carter W, Gilson B . The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care. 1981; 19(8):787-805. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198108000-00001. View

3.
Velikova G, Wright E, Smith A, Cull A, Gould A, Forman D . Automated collection of quality-of-life data: a comparison of paper and computer touch-screen questionnaires. J Clin Oncol. 1999; 17(3):998-1007. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.3.998. View

4.
Lee-Jones C, Humphris G, Dixon R, HATCHER M . Fear of cancer recurrence--a literature review and proposed cognitive formulation to explain exacerbation of recurrence fears. Psychooncology. 1997; 6(2):95-105. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1611(199706)6:2<95::AID-PON250>3.0.CO;2-B. View

5.
Vant Spijker A, Trijsburg R, Duivenvoorden H . Psychological sequelae of cancer diagnosis: a meta-analytical review of 58 studies after 1980. Psychosom Med. 1997; 59(3):280-93. DOI: 10.1097/00006842-199705000-00011. View