» Articles » PMID: 15223854

Quality Control of Laboratory Methods for Semen Evaluation in a Multicenter Research Study

Overview
Journal J Androl
Date 2004 Jun 30
PMID 15223854
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rigorously standardized laboratory protocols and strict quality control (QC) are essential for meaningful comparisons between semen quality data from multiple sites. We describe our experience with the Study for Future Families (SFF), a multicenter study of semen quality in the United States. Detailed protocols were developed, and technicians from each study site attended a training session at the central laboratory. Technicians received blinded replicates from diluted semen specimens for counting by MicroCell and hemacytometer. Sperm motility was assessed using videotaped recordings for simple percent motility and categorical assessment of individual sperm progression as recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO). The mean intertechnician coefficient of variation for individual specimens was 12.6% for MicroCell counts, 15.2% for hemacytometer counts, and 10.5% for percent motility. Intratechnician coefficients of variation averaged 10.3% for MicroCell counts, 12.5% for hemacytometer counts, and 5.2% for percent motility. The average percent differences between the technicians' values and the central standard for individual specimens were 13.5%, 16.6%, and 11.9% for MicroCell counts, hemacytometer counts, and simple percent motility, respectively. We achieved our goal of maintaining mean intratechnician coefficients of variation and mean percent differences from the standard values of 15% or less for measurements of simple percent motility and sperm concentration by MicroCell. Standardization using the Improved Neubauer hemacytometer chamber proved more difficult. We were not successful in standardizing a method for categorical assessment of individual sperm progression.

Citing Articles

Interobserver Variability in Semen Analysis: Findings From a Quality Control Initiative.

Siddharth K, Kumar T, Zabihullah M Cureus. 2023; 15(10):e46388.

PMID: 37927724 PMC: 10620459. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.46388.


Validation of the volumetric flow cytometry for bovine sperm concentration.

Gloria A, Bracco C, Antenucci E, Contri A Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):16560.

PMID: 37783767 PMC: 10545691. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-43678-7.


Spatiotemporal trends in human semen quality.

Auger J, Eustache F, Chevrier C, Jegou B Nat Rev Urol. 2022; 19(10):597-626.

PMID: 35978007 PMC: 9383660. DOI: 10.1038/s41585-022-00626-w.


Occupation and Semen Parameters in a Cohort of Fertile Men.

Meyer J, Brazil C, Redmon J, Wang C, Sparks A, Swan S J Occup Environ Med. 2022; 64(10):831-838.

PMID: 35902368 PMC: 9529786. DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002607.


Sperm count is increased by diet-induced weight loss and maintained by exercise or GLP-1 analogue treatment: a randomized controlled trial.

Andersen E, Juhl C, Kjoller E, Lundgren J, Janus C, Dehestani Y Hum Reprod. 2022; 37(7):1414-1422.

PMID: 35580859 PMC: 9247415. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deac096.