» Articles » PMID: 15215524

Trapping a 96 Degrees Domain Rotation in Two Distinct Conformations by Engineered Disulfide Bridges

Overview
Journal Protein Sci
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2004 Jun 25
PMID 15215524
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Engineering disulfide bridges is a common technique to lock a protein movement in a defined conformational state. We have designed two double mutants of Escherichia coli 5'-nucleotidase to trap the enzyme in both an open (S228C, P513C) and a closed (P90C, L424C) conformation by the formation of disulfide bridges. The mutant proteins have been expressed, purified, and crystallized, to structurally characterize the designed variants. The S228C, P513C is a double mutant crystallized in two different crystal forms with three independent conformers, which differ from each other by a rotation of up to 12 degrees of the C-terminal domain with respect to the N-terminal domain. This finding, as well as an analysis of the domain motion in the crystal, indicates that the enzyme still exhibits considerable residual domain flexibility. In the double mutant that was designed to trap the enzyme in the closed conformation, the structure analysis reveals an unexpected intermediate conformation along the 96 degrees rotation trajectory between the open and closed enzyme forms. A comparison of the five independent conformers analyzed in this study shows that the domain movement of the variant enzymes is characterized by a sliding movement of the residues of the domain interface along the interface, which is in contrast to a classical closure motion where the residues of the domain interface move perpendicular to the interface.

Citing Articles

Genomic Distribution of Pro-Virulent -like Genes in Eubacteria and Comparison of the Enzyme Specificity of CpdB-like Proteins from , and .

Ribeiro J, Canales J, Costas M, Cabezas A, Pinto R, Garcia-Diaz M Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(4).

PMID: 36835561 PMC: 9958556. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24044150.


Substrate Specificity of Chimeric Enzymes Formed by Interchange of the Catalytic and Specificity Domains of the 5-Nucleotidase UshA and the 3-Nucleotidase CpdB.

Cabezas A, Lopez-Villamizar I, Costas M, Cameselle J, Ribeiro J Molecules. 2021; 26(8).

PMID: 33923386 PMC: 8071527. DOI: 10.3390/molecules26082307.


Molecular Dissection of CpdB: Roles of the N Domain in Catalysis and Phosphate Inhibition, and of the C Domain in Substrate Specificity and Adenosine Inhibition.

Lopez-Villamizar I, Cabezas A, Pinto R, Canales J, Ribeiro J, Rodrigues J Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(4).

PMID: 33671286 PMC: 7922932. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22041977.


Microfocus diffraction from different regions of a protein crystal: structural variations and unit-cell polymorphism.

Thompson M, Cascio D, Yeates T Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol. 2018; 74(Pt 5):411-421.

PMID: 29717712 PMC: 5930349. DOI: 10.1107/S2059798318003479.


Trapped intermediate state of plant pyruvate phosphate dikinase indicates substeps in catalytic swiveling domain mechanism.

Minges A, Hoppner A, Groth G Protein Sci. 2017; 26(8):1667-1673.

PMID: 28470715 PMC: 5521584. DOI: 10.1002/pro.3184.


References
1.
Velanker S, Gokhale R, Ray S, Gopal B, Parthasarathy S, Santi D . Disulfide engineering at the dimer interface of Lactobacillus casei thymidylate synthase: crystal structure of the T155C/E188C/C244T mutant. Protein Sci. 1999; 8(4):930-3. PMC: 2144305. DOI: 10.1110/ps.8.4.930. View

2.
Knofel T, Strater N . X-ray structure of the Escherichia coli periplasmic 5'-nucleotidase containing a dimetal catalytic site. Nat Struct Biol. 1999; 6(5):448-53. DOI: 10.1038/8253. View

3.
Perrakis A, Morris R, Lamzin V . Automated protein model building combined with iterative structure refinement. Nat Struct Biol. 1999; 6(5):458-63. DOI: 10.1038/8263. View

4.
Petersen M, Jonson P, Petersen S . Amino acid neighbours and detailed conformational analysis of cysteines in proteins. Protein Eng. 1999; 12(7):535-48. DOI: 10.1093/protein/12.7.535. View

5.
Ravelli R, McSweeney S . The 'fingerprint' that X-rays can leave on structures. Structure. 2000; 8(3):315-28. DOI: 10.1016/s0969-2126(00)00109-x. View