» Articles » PMID: 15212723

Cost-effectiveness in Preventive Cardiology

Overview
Date 2004 Jun 24
PMID 15212723
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cardiovascular disease remains a serious medical problem, which can be associated with death and disability on one hand, and considerable resource utilization on the other. The primary driver for choice of therapy must remain clinical efficacy. Once efficacy is established, cost-effectiveness analysis has an important role. Resources are limited, and responsible choices must be made. The methods involved in cost-effectiveness analysis are complicated and data for the analysis are generally not fully optimal. Nonetheless, cost-effectiveness analysis offers the best method for helping society make rational medical decisions. Effective interventions, when reasonably priced, for the prevention of cardiovascular disease have generally proven to be cost-effective.

References
1.
Shepherd J, Cobbe S, Ford I, Isles C, LORIMER A, Macfarlane P . Prevention of coronary heart disease with pravastatin in men with hypercholesterolemia. West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1995; 333(20):1301-7. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199511163332001. View

2.
Jones T, Eaton C . Cost-benefit analysis of walking to prevent coronary heart disease. Arch Fam Med. 1994; 3(8):703-10. DOI: 10.1001/archfami.3.8.703. View

3.
Evans D . Principles involved in costing. Med J Aust. 1990; 153(S1):S10-2. DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1990.tb136982.x. View

4.
Yusuf S, Sleight P, Pogue J, Bosch J, Davies R, Dagenais G . Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2000; 342(3):145-53. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200001203420301. View

5.
Loomes G, McKenzie L . The use of QALYs in health care decision making. Soc Sci Med. 1989; 28(4):299-308. DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(89)90030-0. View