» Articles » PMID: 15203776

Is There a Simple Correction Factor for Comparing Adolescent Tobacco-use Estimates from School- and Home-based Surveys?

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2004 Jun 19
PMID 15203776
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

School surveys conducted to monitor the prevalence of adolescent smoking generally yield higher estimates than home-based surveys. Our goal was to examine the consistency of this mode effect over age for different measures of adolescent smoking behavior. If consistent, it would be feasible to define a simple adjustment factor for comparing overall results across survey modes. We identified three pairs of school- and home-based surveys (two national pairs and one California pair), each pair conducted in the same year, that allowed us to compare three key measures of adolescent smoking across age: (a) Ever tried, (b) smoking in past 30 days, and (c) regular smoking. We also examined male experimentation with smokeless tobacco, for which a mode effect has not been investigated. School surveys yielded higher estimates than in-home surveys for all the tobacco-use measures examined. In general, the mode effect was greater in younger age groups. Estimates for the two modes appeared closer for current and regular smoking measures compared with the ever-tried measure. Considering report of smoking in the past 30 days, the mode effect was much greater for infrequent smoking (1-9 days) than for more frequent (10+ days) smoking. Finally, school surveys yielded much higher estimates for male smokeless tobacco use than did home surveys. Because mode effects were related to age and level of reported use, no simple correction factor for comparing across modes is feasible. Social desirability bias of self-reported behavior in the different settings may account in part for the observed mode effects.

Citing Articles

Impact of Survey Setting on Current Tobacco Product Use: National Youth Tobacco Survey, 2021.

Park-Lee E, Gentzke A, Ren C, Cooper M, Sawdey M, Hu S J Adolesc Health. 2022; 72(3):365-374.

PMID: 36470692 PMC: 11036859. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.10.012.


Nicotine Addiction and Intensity of e-Cigarette Use by Adolescents in the US, 2014 to 2021.

Glantz S, Jeffers A, Winickoff J JAMA Netw Open. 2022; 5(11):e2240671.

PMID: 36342713 PMC: 9641541. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.40671.


Physical activity among adolescent tobacco and electronic cigarette users: Cross-sectional findings from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health study.

Miller C, Smith D, Goniewicz M Prev Med Rep. 2019; 15:100897.

PMID: 31193540 PMC: 6531914. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100897.


Biases Inherent in Studies of Coffee Consumption in Early Pregnancy and the Risks of Subsequent Events.

Leviton A Nutrients. 2018; 10(9).

PMID: 30142937 PMC: 6163788. DOI: 10.3390/nu10091152.


Association Between Receptivity to Tobacco Advertising and Progression to Tobacco Use in Youth and Young Adults in the PATH Study.

Pierce J, Sargent J, Portnoy D, White M, Noble M, Kealey S JAMA Pediatr. 2018; 172(5):444-451.

PMID: 29582078 PMC: 5875336. DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.5756.