» Articles » PMID: 15196194

Nurses' Use of Online Clinical Evidence

Overview
Journal J Adv Nurs
Specialty Nursing
Date 2004 Jun 16
PMID 15196194
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The 'information explosion' presents a significant challenge to the nursing profession. One way to assist access to information is to provide electronic information resources at the point of care. A large-scale survey of nurses working in the public health system in New South Wales, Australia, was undertaken as part of a 2-year evaluation of the Clinical Information Access Program (CIAP). This is a website which provides 24 hour, online access to a range of evidence sources at the point of care.

Aim: This paper reports a study to investigate factors influencing nurses' use of online evidence available at the point of care and to examine differences between nurses in different roles.

Method: Nurses from 65 randomly selected hospitals were surveyed. A convenience sample representing 25% of nursing staff at these hospitals was sought. Eighty-four per cent of the survey quota was met and 3128 questionnaires were completed and returned.

Results: The results showed that 58% of nurses had heard of the CIAP and, of those, 70% had used the website's resources. Senior nurses had greater awareness and use than others. The most frequent reasons for use were to fill a knowledge gap and for personal education. Lack of training was the most frequently cited reason for not using the website. Use of online evidence, particularly amongst senior staff, was higher than reported in previous studies.

Conclusion: Use of online evidence was associated with nursing role, and with managerial and organizational support. Diffusion of innovation theory can help to explain some of the patterns observed. The use and impact of online evidence should be interpreted in the context of nursing practice and culture.

Citing Articles

Patient-specific computer-based decision support in primary healthcare--a randomized trial.

Kortteisto T, Raitanen J, Komulainen J, Kunnamo I, Makela M, Rissanen P Implement Sci. 2014; 9:15.

PMID: 24444113 PMC: 3901002. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-15.


Clinical decision support must be useful, functional is not enough: a qualitative study of computer-based clinical decision support in primary care.

Kortteisto T, Komulainen J, Makela M, Kunnamo I, Kaila M BMC Health Serv Res. 2012; 12:349.

PMID: 23039113 PMC: 3508894. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-349.


Primary care physicians' experiences with electronic medical records: implementation experience in community, urban, hospital, and academic family medicine.

Ludwick D, Manca D, Doucette J Can Fam Physician. 2010; 56(1):40-7.

PMID: 20090083 PMC: 2809179.


Continence specialists use of quality of life information in routine practice: a national survey of practitioners.

Haywood K, Garratt A, Carrivick S, Mangnall J, Skevington S Qual Life Res. 2009; 18(4):423-33.

PMID: 19267220 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-009-9459-1.


Primary Care Physicians' Experience with Electronic Medical Records: Barriers to Implementation in a Fee-for-Service Environment.

Ludwick D, Doucette J Int J Telemed Appl. 2008; 2009:853524.

PMID: 19081787 PMC: 2593889. DOI: 10.1155/2009/853524.