» Articles » PMID: 15194075

Laparoscopy-assisted Distal Gastrectomy with Systemic Lymph Node Dissection: a Critical Reappraisal from the Viewpoint of Lymph Node Retrieval

Overview
Journal J Am Coll Surg
Date 2004 Jun 15
PMID 15194075
Citations 42
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Laparoscopy-assisted surgery has proved useful in the treatment of early gastric cancer, but its use in advanced cancer may be hindered by limitations in lymphadenectomy.

Study Design: Data on lymph node retrieval after distal gastrectomy with D1 or D2 lymphadenectomy (n = 89) performed by the laparoscopy-assisted approach were collected between 1998 and 2002 and compared with data obtained from conventional open surgery performed for T1 cancer at a high-volume hospital (n = 342) during the same period. Comparisons of total number of lymph nodes, retrieval at each lymph node station, and the rate of noncompliance (no nodal tissue documented at a node station that should have been resected) were conducted using Student's t-test and the chi-square test.

Results: D2 resection by the laparoscopy-assisted approach harvested a sufficient number of nodes for adequate TNM classification (>15 nodes) in 86% of patients. Nevertheless, a significantly greater number of lymph nodes were harvested by open surgery. The difference was significant for the perigastric lymph nodes along the major curvature (Nos. 4 and 6) and second tier nodes along the celiac and splenic arteries (Nos. 9 and 11).

Conclusions: The extent of lymphadenectomy achieved by current laparoscopic procedure approaches the global standard for accurate staging, although performing extended resection as recommended in Japan remains a challenge.

Citing Articles

A review of wrist mechanism design and the application in gastrointestinal minimally invasive surgery of multi-degree-of-freedom surgical laparoscopic instruments.

Tu Y, Jiang J, Huang J, Sui J, Yang S Surg Endosc. 2024; 39(1):99-121.

PMID: 39653859 PMC: 11666641. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11406-5.


Laparoscopic vs. open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Yan Y, Ou C, Cao S, Hua Y, Sha Y Front Surg. 2023; 10:1127854.

PMID: 36874456 PMC: 9982133. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1127854.


Laparoscopic vs. Open Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Retrospective Case-Control Study.

Caruso S, Giudicissi R, Mariatti M, Cantafio S, Paroli G, Scatizzi M Curr Oncol. 2022; 29(3):1840-1865.

PMID: 35323351 PMC: 8947505. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29030151.


Laparoscopic versus open approach in gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review.

Zhu Z, Li L, Xu J, Ye W, Zeng J, Chen B World J Surg Oncol. 2020; 18(1):126.

PMID: 32534587 PMC: 7293787. DOI: 10.1186/s12957-020-01888-7.


Difference in the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma between the east and west: a retrospective study from the IMIGASTRIC trial.

Lin J, Lin J, Desiderio J, Xie J, Gemini A, Wang J J Cancer. 2019; 10(17):4106-4113.

PMID: 31417655 PMC: 6692614. DOI: 10.7150/jca.31192.