Canine Distemper Virus Increases Procoagulant Activity of Macrophages
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Inflammatory demyelination in canine distemper has been proposed to be due to a "bystander" mechanism, in which macrophages play an important role. In the present work we studied whether infection of macrophages by canine distemper virus (CDV) results in changes of macrophage functions, including Fc receptor-dependent and -independent phagocytosis, release of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and procoagulant activity (PCA). As a source of macrophages, dog bone marrow cells were seeded in teflon bags and grown for 1-2 weeks, at which time a marked enrichment of macrophages was noted. These cells were infected with the A75/17 strain of CDV. We could not detect any significant difference between uninfected and CDV-infected macrophages with respect to Fc receptor-dependent or -independent phagocytosis or with respect to the release of ROS. However, from Day 4 p.i. to the end of our observation period (10 days p.i.), PCA was up to 10-fold higher in CDV-infected unstimulated macrophage cultures than in uninfected unstimulated cultures of the same age. Increase in PCA was not due to the inoculation procedure by itself nor to components of the inoculum other than CDV; in particular, PCA was not due to contaminating endotoxin. Thus, several important macrophage functions do not appear to be impaired by CDV infection. The marked increase of macrophage PCA expression suggests that certain macrophage functions may even be enhanced as a result of infection. Such macrophage activation might contribute to the pathogenesis of the disease.
Morbilliviruses use signaling lymphocyte activation molecules (CD150) as cellular receptors.
Tatsuo H, Ono N, Yanagi Y J Virol. 2001; 75(13):5842-50.
PMID: 11390585 PMC: 114299. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.13.5842-5850.2001.
Cherpillod P, Beck K, Zurbriggen A, Wittek R J Virol. 1999; 73(3):2263-9.
PMID: 9971809 PMC: 104471. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.73.3.2263-2269.1999.
CD9, a tetraspan transmembrane protein, renders cells susceptible to canine distemper virus.
Loffler S, Lottspeich F, Lanza F, Azorsa D, Ter Meulen V, Schneider-Schaulies J J Virol. 1997; 71(1):42-9.
PMID: 8985321 PMC: 191022. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.71.1.42-49.1997.
The neurobiology of canine distemper virus infection.
Vandevelde M, Zurbriggen A Vet Microbiol. 1995; 44(2-4):271-80.
PMID: 8588322 PMC: 7117369. DOI: 10.1016/0378-1135(95)00021-2.
Graber H, Muller C, Vandevelde M, Zurbriggen A Acta Neuropathol. 1995; 90(3):312-8.
PMID: 8525806 DOI: 10.1007/BF00296516.