Evaluation of the Iowa Medicaid Pharmaceutical Case Management Program
Overview
Pharmacy
Authors
Affiliations
Objective: To test the effect of pharmaceutical case management (PCM) on medication safety and health care utilization.
Design: Prospective cohort design with 9-month follow-up period (enrollment from October 1, 2000, through July 1, 2001, with follow-up through July 1, 2002).
Setting: Iowa Medicaid program.
Participants: 2,211 noninstitutionalized, continuously eligible Iowa Medicaid patients taking four or more chronic medications including at least one agent commonly used in at least 1 of 12 specific diseases who were cared for by pharmacists in 117 pharmacies.
Interventions: Reimbursement for PCM services (initial patient assessment, written recommendations to physician, follow-up assessments and communication of progress and new problems to physician).
Main Outcome Measures: Use of high-risk medications, Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI) score, health care utilization.
Results: Pharmacists in 114 pharmacies had eligible patients during at least one quarter during the study period; 28 pharmacies were classified as high intensity based on the number of PCM patients they managed. A total of 524 of the eligible patients received 1,599 PCM services; 90% of claims were filed by pharmacists, and the remainder by physicians. Nearly one half (46.1%) of medications and 92.1% of patients had at least one medication problem before PCM. By closeout, the percentage of medications with problems decreased in 8 of 10 MAI domains for those who received PCM. Compared with baseline, mean MAI score improved significantly from 9.4 to 8.3 among PCM recipients (P < .001). Percentage of PCM recipients using high-risk medications decreased significantly compared with PCM eligibles who did not receive the service. In the 28 pharmacies that adopted the new service most intensely, patients had a significant decrease in high-risk medication use, compared with patients of low-intensity pharmacies (P < .001). No difference was observed between PCM recipients and PCM eligibles who did not receive PCM in health care utilization or charges, even after including reimbursements for PCM.
Conclusion: Medication safety problems were prevalent in this high-risk population. The PCM program improved medication safety during a 9-month follow-up period.
Liu Y, Farris K, Nayakankuppam D, Sorofman B, Urmie J, Doucette W Front Pharmacol. 2024; 15:1375529.
PMID: 39376602 PMC: 11456739. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1375529.
Attitude and Needs Toward MTM Applications of Chronic Disease in China: A Questionnaire Survey.
Huang S, Huang J, Deng X, Ouyang L, He G, Sun J Front Public Health. 2022; 10:812709.
PMID: 35968452 PMC: 9372339. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.812709.
Alanazi A, Alfadl A, Hussain A Saudi J Med Med Sci. 2019; 4(1):9-14.
PMID: 30787688 PMC: 6298263. DOI: 10.4103/1658-631X.170881.
Comprehensive Medication Management and Medication Adherence for Chronic Conditions.
Brummel A, Carlson A J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016; 22(1):56-62.
PMID: 27015052 PMC: 10397616. DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.1.56.
Osborne M, Snyder M, Hall D, Coley K, McGivney M Innov Pharm. 2014; 2(4):61.
PMID: 25405069 PMC: 4232935. DOI: 10.24926/iip.v2i4.244.