» Articles » PMID: 15186469

The Intensive Care Experience: Development of the ICE Questionnaire

Overview
Journal J Adv Nurs
Specialty Nursing
Date 2004 Jun 10
PMID 15186469
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Previous research has shown that patients' reported memories of intensive care are often of unpleasant events which are described as frightening and persecutory in nature. Currently, there is no standardized way of assessing perceptions of such an experience or relating it to long-term outcome.

Aims: This paper describes the development of an intensive care experience questionnaire which aims to (a) identify the domains of such an experience, (b) assess and quantify that experience, and (c) explore its impact on short- and long-term emotional outcome.

Methods: Data from two studies are reported. Participants were non-elective patients and > or =18 years of age with an ICU stay > or =24 hours. Study 1 (n = 34) generated and developed items. Study 2 (n = 109) allowed evaluation of the factor analytic structure and psychometrics of the questionnaire.

Results: From a set of 31 items, exploratory factor analysis identified four components of the intensive care experience: 'awareness of surroundings' (nine items), 'frightening experiences' (six items), 'recall of experience' (five items), and 'satisfaction with care' (four items). Cronbach's alpha statistics were acceptable for each component (0.71-0.93). Correlational analysis with the subscales of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Impact of Event Scale demonstrated concurrent and univariate predictive validity. The intensive care experience was associated with adverse emotional outcome in both the short- and long-term.

Discussion: The intensive care experience questionnaire identified four dimensions of experience and performed satisfactorily in these developmental analyses. Further study of an independent intensive care unit data set is necessary to confirm these findings, including the four-component structure. Development of a standardized measure provides the opportunity to increase our understanding of the intensive care experience. The questionnaire may be useful to inform the development of effective interventions to improve subsequent outcomes for these patients.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of Respiratory Intensive Care Experiences and Relationships with Nutritional Status Among Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.

Yildiz M, Celik D, Ozdemir T, Ensarioglu K, Cakir M, Savur T Medicina (Kaunas). 2025; 61(2).

PMID: 40005472 PMC: 11857773. DOI: 10.3390/medicina61020356.


The effect of informing patients with video before cardiac surgery on intensive care experience: A randomized controlled trial.

Kalkan A, Digin F Pak J Med Sci. 2024; 40(6):1067-1072.

PMID: 38952513 PMC: 11190428. DOI: 10.12669/pjms.40.6.8627.


Alpha 2 agonists for sedation to produce better outcomes from critical illness (A2B Trial): protocol for a multicentre phase 3 pragmatic clinical and cost-effectiveness randomised trial in the UK.

Walsh T, Aitken L, McKenzie C, Boyd J, Macdonald A, Giddings A BMJ Open. 2023; 13(12):e078645.

PMID: 38072483 PMC: 10729141. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078645.


The Stressful Memory Assessment Checklist for the Intensive Care Unit (SMAC-ICU): Development and Testing.

Samuelson K Healthcare (Basel). 2022; 10(7).

PMID: 35885846 PMC: 9317350. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10071321.


Study protocol to test the efficacy of self-administration of dexmedetomidine sedative therapy on anxiety, delirium, and ventilator days in critically ill mechanically ventilated patients: an open-label randomized clinical trial.

Chlan L, Weinert C, Tracy M, Skaar D, Gajic O, Ask J Trials. 2022; 23(1):406.

PMID: 35578315 PMC: 9108372. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06391-w.