» Articles » PMID: 15179185

Deacetylase Inhibition in Malignant Melanomas: Impact on Cell Cycle Regulation and Survival

Overview
Journal Melanoma Res
Specialty Oncology
Date 2004 Jun 5
PMID 15179185
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the present study the deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A (TSA) was used to elucidate the effect of protein acetylation on cell cycle progression and survival in seven human malignant melanoma cell lines. It was shown that TSA treatment led to a transient G(2)/M phase delay and accumulation of unphosphorylated retinoblastoma protein (pRB) in all cases. TSA significantly induced protein expression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21(WAF1/CIP1) in a dose-dependent manner in all cell lines including those not expressing p21(WAF1/CIP1) constitutively, whereas the levels of both wild-type and mutated p53 protein were reduced. The effect on p53 was not a direct result of inhibition of extracellular signal-regulated kinase-1/2 (ERK1/2) activation by TSA, as treatment of the cells with the mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase-1 (MEK1) inhibitor PD98059 did not result in decreased p53 protein level. Furthermore, TSA treatment led to reduction in cyclin D1 whereas cyclin D3 accumulated, the latter due to increased protein stability. Similarly, cyclin A protein was reduced whereas cyclin E level was elevated. The effect on p27(Kip1), CDK4 and CDK2 was only marginal. In all the examined cell lines, TSA treatment resulted in a profound induction of apoptosis and cleavage of poly-(ADP-ribose)-polymerase (PARP) indicative of caspase activity. Similarly, TSA-mediated apoptosis was reversed by the caspase-inhibitor z-vad-fmk. Altogether, these results suggest that p21(WAF1/CIP1) in melanomas is silenced by deacetylation, and furthermore that inhibition of deacetylation may have potential in anticancer therapy of melanoma patients.

Citing Articles

Epigenetics and ultraviolet radiation: Implications for skin ageing and carcinogenesis.

Barnes B, Shyne A, Gunn D, Griffiths C, Watson R Skin Health Dis. 2024; 4(6):e410.

PMID: 39624739 PMC: 11608893. DOI: 10.1002/ski2.410.


Current understanding of epigenetics role in melanoma treatment and resistance.

Karami Fath M, Azargoonjahromi A, Soofi A, Almasi F, Hosseinzadeh S, Khalili S Cancer Cell Int. 2022; 22(1):313.

PMID: 36224606 PMC: 9555085. DOI: 10.1186/s12935-022-02738-0.


What we have learnt from model organism: the coordination between insulin signaling pathway and tumor cells.

Weina T, Ying L, Yiwen W, Huan-Huan Q Heliyon. 2022; 8(7):e09957.

PMID: 35874083 PMC: 9304707. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09957.


Association of Valproic Acid Use, a Potent Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor, and Melanoma Risk.

Chavez A, Quesenberry Jr C, Darbinian J, Asgari M J Invest Dermatol. 2020; 140(12):2353-2358.

PMID: 32353448 PMC: 7606214. DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2020.04.007.


Sulforaphane and iberin are potent epigenetic modulators of histone acetylation and methylation in malignant melanoma.

Mitsiogianni M, Trafalis D, Franco R, Zoumpourlis V, Pappa A, Panayiotidis M Eur J Nutr. 2020; 60(1):147-158.

PMID: 32215717 DOI: 10.1007/s00394-020-02227-y.